22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

3<br />

1 – Aeration<br />

2 – Stock bottle with mineral medium<br />

3 – Pump<br />

1 - Aeration<br />

4 – Flow Cell FC 81<br />

2 - Stock bottle with mineral medium<br />

Fig. 3 - 2. Pump Scheme of the FC 81 Flow Cell connection during the<br />

experiment 4 - Flow cell FC 81<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1<br />

2 3<br />

1 – Cover Glass<br />

1 - Cover 2 – Slide glass<br />

4 – Space for medium flow<br />

2 - Slide 3 – Cellophane 5 – Parts of the flow cell<br />

3 - Cellophane<br />

Fig. <strong>3.</strong> Cross-section of the FC 81 Flow Cell<br />

4 - Space for medium flow<br />

5 - Parts of the flow cell<br />

Results<br />

C h a r a c t e r o f C e l l E n v e l o p e s o f<br />

T r i c h o s p o r o n C u t a n e u m<br />

The results obtained by MATH method are summarized<br />

in Table I. The cell envelopes of the population Trichosporon<br />

cutaneum grown in the presence of filter paper had the most<br />

4<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Table II<br />

Influence of shear stress on the cellophane colonization and object morphology changes<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1<br />

s655<br />

Table I<br />

Hydrophobity of cell envelopes in dependence on using different<br />

types of cellulosic substrates as sole of carbon<br />

Cellulosic substrate Cell hydrofobity [%]<br />

filter paper 8<strong>3.</strong>8<br />

cellophane 51.8<br />

carboxymethylcellulose 76.4<br />

hydroxyethylcellulose 79.3<br />

Sigmacell Type 101 9.6<br />

Fig. 4. Cells of Trichosporon cutaneum attached on cellophane<br />

(phase contrast)<br />

hydrophobic character (8<strong>3.</strong>8 %), whereas the population cultivated<br />

on Sigmacell had very hydrophilic cell surfaces. The<br />

hydrophobity of cellophane stripes (95.6 %) was determined<br />

at Department of Polymers, ICT Prague. We wanted to choose<br />

cells with similar surface characters as the cellophane<br />

stripes. Filter paper could not be used for biomass preparation<br />

because of low biomass concentration. For this reason<br />

HEC was used for following experiments.<br />

I n f l u e n c e o f S h e a r S t r e s s o n<br />

C e l l o p h a n e C o l o n i z a t i o n<br />

Low flow rates of medium are less favourable for<br />

the cellophane colonization (Table II). Also small areas<br />

Flow rate [ml min –1 ] Colonized area [%] Objects in field Area [μm 2 ] Lenght [μm] Width [μm] Elongation*<br />

2 4.86 12 180.98 27.92 5.94 1.76<br />

4 4.42 12 176.64 24.00 6.33 1.81<br />

6 16.07 27 194.27 29.56 5.40 1.76<br />

8 8.49 40 80.42 15.02 5.01 1.69<br />

10 4.25 21 97.32 15.69 5.50 1.74<br />

15 2.38 15 86.32 15.79 5.25 1.97<br />

20 6.08 24 117.22 20.90 5.65 2.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!