22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

found in freshwater fish and fish products. Their occurrence<br />

was also observed in meat. A common source of them is also<br />

milk fat. Selection of the highest sums of analytical findings<br />

in 2007 (n = 110) is shown in the Fig. 1. and Fig. 2. The nonfat<br />

samples are logically less contaminated groups concerning<br />

these analytes. The data were used for assessment of<br />

dietary exposure of the population of the Czech Republic<br />

(Fig. <strong>3.</strong>, Fig. 4.).<br />

Conclusions<br />

As the PCBs can accumulate in animal tissues, the foods<br />

of animal origin are one of the most significant sources of<br />

exposure. Higher exposure doses can be particularly expected<br />

in persons with high intake of animal fats. Hence, the decrease<br />

in consumption of animal fat can significantly contribute<br />

to lowering exposure doses.<br />

Fig. 1. Selection of foods with the highest concentrations of<br />

PCbs (sum of PCb 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180) in 2007<br />

Fig. 2. Selection of foods with the highest concentrations of<br />

sum of DDT + DDE + DDD in 2007<br />

The trends in population exposure to DDT isomers and<br />

its analogues (DDD, DDE) and PCBs have been investigated<br />

since 1994. The found results expressed as the dietary exposure<br />

for the average Czech population (considering food<br />

consumption and the culinary factor) did not even reach the<br />

acceptable daily intake for any monitored POPs. The found<br />

exposition doses of individual POPs probably do not present<br />

a serious health risk for the average population of the Czech<br />

Republic. Detailed information about the monitoring can<br />

be found in publications of the national Institute of Public<br />

s693<br />

Fig. <strong>3.</strong> The trend of exposure doses for a sum of 7 PCbs (28, 52,<br />

101, 118, 138, 153, 180) since 1996 to 2007<br />

Fig. 4. The trend of exposure to sum DDT (= DDT + DDE + DDD)<br />

since 1996 to 2007<br />

Health in Prague, describing human dietary exposure in the<br />

Czech Republic.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Ruprich J.: The Health Risk Assessment of Dietary<br />

Exposure to Selected Chemical Substances in year 2002.<br />

national Institute of Public Health, Prague 2003<br />

2. Ruprich J.: Food basket for CR: Exposure Factors – CR<br />

1994 . natinal Institute of Public Health, Prague 1997<br />

<strong>3.</strong> Ruprich J., Dofková M., KOPřIVA V., Resová D.,<br />

řehůřková I.: Spotřební koš potravin pro ČR. Praha:<br />

SZU Praha, 2000.<br />

4. Ruprich J., et al.: Zdravotní důsledky zátěže lidského<br />

organizmu cizorodými látkami z potravinových řetězců<br />

v roce 2005: Státní zdravotní ústav Praha, 2006. hppt://<br />

www.chpr.szu.cz/monitor/tds05c/tds05c.htm<br />

5. řehůřková I.: Cent. Eur. J. Publ. Health 10, 174 (2002).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!