22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

Table I<br />

Retention time (t R ) and linearity of SAs<br />

Sulfonamide t R [min] b a a b<br />

SDA 7.51 127301 –3582<br />

SPY 8.82 108274 –24580<br />

SMR 9.65 121645 –9957<br />

SIO 12.88 97992 2987<br />

SMO 1<strong>3.</strong>37 112048 18902<br />

SDM 20.79 83942 –14029<br />

b a : Slope<br />

a b : Intercept<br />

The linear correlation coefficient (r 2 ) are all above<br />

0.999.<br />

Chromatograms of a blank sample and of a spiked sample<br />

of chicken muscle are shown in Fig. 1. and 2.<br />

Fig. 1. The chromatogram of blank chicken muscle<br />

Table II<br />

Recoveries of SAs in chicken meat tissue (n = 3)<br />

Sulfonamides Spiked [μg kg –1 ] Recovery [%]<br />

SDA<br />

SPY<br />

SMR<br />

SIO<br />

SMO<br />

SDM<br />

50 78. ± 2.3<br />

100 80.4 ± 4.7<br />

50 72.6 ± 6.8<br />

100 75.3 ± 7.2<br />

50 65.6 ± 4.3<br />

100 67.9 ± 2.5<br />

50 77.8 ± 1.2<br />

100 79.4 ± <strong>3.</strong>4<br />

50 74.7 ± 5.6<br />

100 76.5 ± 6.4<br />

50 76.3 ± 7.6<br />

100 78.7 ± 6.9<br />

s590<br />

Fig. 2. The chromatogram of the spiked sample with 50 μg kg –1<br />

of the following sulfonamides: 1:SDA, 2: SPy, 3: SMR, 4: SIO,<br />

5: SMO, 6:SDM<br />

Under this extraction and pre-treatment procedure , the<br />

sulfonamide fortified chicken sample did not induce peaks<br />

interfering with SAs peaks. The recoveries of analytes were<br />

evaluated by spiking 0.5 and 1 μg of each standard analyte to<br />

10.0 g tissues. The results are listed in Table II.<br />

Good recoveries ranging from 65.6 to 80.4 % were<br />

determined, which indicated that sample preparation procedure<br />

was suitable for the analysis of SAs in chicken meat<br />

sample.<br />

As an application, 30 samples of commercial chicken<br />

meat purchased from local food market were analysed using<br />

the present method. no residue sulfonamide was detected in<br />

all meat sample. All HPLC chromatograms were free from<br />

interferences.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In this study , an analytical method to determine six SAs<br />

in chicken meat was developed utilizing two SPE cartridges<br />

for sample clean-up and pre-concentration of analytical components<br />

prior to HPLC analysis. The newly developed sample<br />

pre-treatment procedure effectively removed the potential<br />

matrix interferences from endogenous compounds of meat.<br />

Average recoveries of analytes from spiked meat ranging<br />

from 65.6 to 80.4 % of six SAs were determined.<br />

This work has been supported by the Natio-nal Authority<br />

for Scientific Research of Romania, CEEX project no.<br />

62/2006.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Kim D. S., Park M. S.: Yonsei Med. J. 39, 595 (1998).<br />

2. Establishment of Maximum Residue Levels of Veterinary<br />

Medical products in foodstuffs of animal origin,<br />

Council Regulation no. 2377/90 of EEC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!