22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

sample was weighted into the plastic test tube. A volume<br />

of 0.5 ml of an internal standard, 1,7-diaminoheptane, with<br />

concentration 1 mg ml –1 was added to the sample and it was<br />

extracted with 20 ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid for two minutes<br />

using a disintegrator Heidolph Diax 900 (Heidolph Instruments,<br />

Germany). Suspension was then centrifuged for<br />

10 minutes (3,000 rpm, 4 °C). The supernatant was filtered<br />

through paper filter (Filtrak no. 390) and the solid residue<br />

was extracted for the second time (using method described<br />

above). Both extracts were collected into one tube, filled in<br />

50 ml with 5% trichloroacetic acid and filtered through the<br />

nylon membrane filter (13 mm, 0.45 μm, Chromatography<br />

research Supplies, Edison, USA). An aliquot 1 ml of an extract<br />

was mixed with 0.5 ml of saturated sodium carbonate<br />

solution (Sigma-Aldrich, s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic) and<br />

derivatized with 1 ml of acetonic solution of dansyl chloride<br />

(5 mg ml –1 ) for 1 hour at 40 °C. The excess of unreacted<br />

derivatisation agent was removed by reaction with 250 μl<br />

10mM ammonia solution. Derivatized biogenic amines were<br />

then extracted into diethyl ether (3 × 1 ml); etheric extract<br />

was evaporated to dryness and dissolved in 500 μl of acetonitrile.<br />

The same procedure was applied on standard solution<br />

of biogenic amines (Sigma-Aldrich). Biogenic amines<br />

were determined as described in Burdychova and Komprda 11<br />

and Burdychova and Dohnal 12 by high performance liquid<br />

chromatography with UV detection at 254 nm. The formation<br />

of biogenic amines by starter and probiotic cultures was<br />

screened as described by Burdychova and Dohnal 12 .<br />

Results<br />

M i c r o b i a l C o u n t s<br />

A number of health benefits have been claimed for probiotic<br />

bacteria such as Lactobacillus casei. Because of the<br />

potential health benefits, this organism is increasingly incorporated<br />

into fermented foods. However, studies have shown<br />

low viability of this probiotic in market preparations 13 .<br />

In both bathes with probiotic bacteria, L. casei was detected<br />

at concentration of 10 4 CFU g –1 during ripening period<br />

and stayed at this level during the whole storage period. The<br />

changes in probiotic flora during ripening and storage of sausages<br />

are shown in Fig. 1. Initial LAB counts in probiotic<br />

batches were significantly higher than in the control samples<br />

without probiotics (p < 0.05), due to the inoculation of starter<br />

strains. During first 14 days of ripening LAB numbers<br />

reached levels up to 10 7 CFU g –1 in all batches; thereafter,<br />

during next 14 days of ripening, the counts of LAB significantly<br />

decreased in all batches to the level of 10 6 CFU g –1 .<br />

The total microbial count reached levels up to 10 8 CFU g –1<br />

in all batches during first 14 days of ripening and their counts<br />

gradually decreased to the level of 10 7 CFU g –1 during next<br />

14 days of ripening and 21 days of storage (data not shown).<br />

To provide health benefits, the suggested concentration<br />

for probiotic bacteria is 10 6 CFU g –1 of a product 13 and daily<br />

consummation of 100 g of such product is recommended.<br />

However, the minimal dose is depended on several factors<br />

such as individual person, probiotic strain and type of food<br />

s602<br />

product 14 . On the other hand, dry sausages are products,<br />

which may be suitable carriers for probiotics into the human<br />

gastrointestinal tract. The question still is, if those types of<br />

meat products can be called functional foods and consumed<br />

daily.<br />

Fig. 1. Changes of probiotic l. casei during ripening (0–28)<br />

and storage (28–49) of sausages „Herkules“, ▲ starter + probiotic<br />

l. casei, ♦ starter 2 + probiotic l. casei<br />

B i o g e n i c A m i n e s F o r m a t i o n<br />

Biogenic amines are formed by the microbial decarboxylation<br />

of free amino acids in food 15 and they are generally<br />

present in dry sausages as reviewed by Maijala 16 and eerola<br />

et al. 17 As described by Buckenhüskes 18 , the absence of biogenic<br />

amines formation should be a selection criterion for<br />

strains used as meat starter cultures. In our study was confirmed<br />

that neither starter nor probiotic cultures formed biogenic<br />

amines (results not shown). All sausages were analyzed<br />

for biogenic amines by HPLC. The concentrations of BA in<br />

the raw material were low but during ripening, fermentation<br />

and storage period a sharp rise occurred in both control and<br />

probiotic batches. The only BA which were at low levels<br />

during the whole ripening and storage periods was histamine,<br />

which concentrations varied from 0.5 to 2.5 mg kg –1 in all<br />

batches (data not shown). nout 19 pointed out that histamine<br />

contents should be in the range of 50–100 mg kg –1 in sausages<br />

processed according to „Good Manufacturing Practice“, the<br />

amount of histamine measured in this study is in agreement<br />

with this rule.<br />

Putrescine was the main amine formed in both control<br />

batches, followed by cadaverine and tyramine. The concentration<br />

of putrescine increased from 1.9 to 101.2 mg kg –1<br />

(control batch 1) and from 4.6 to 350.5 mg kg –1 (control<br />

batch 2). The amount of cadaverine increased from 2.0 to<br />

39.9 mg kg –1 (control batch 1) and from 11.7 to 81.6 mg kg –1<br />

(control batch 2). The level of tyramine increased from 6.3 to<br />

204.4 mg kg –1 (control batch 1) and from 10.5 to 300.4 mg kg –1<br />

(control batch 2), respectively. In this study, putrescine, cadaverine<br />

and tyramine accumulation was significantly inhibited<br />

in probiotic sausages when compared with controls without<br />

probiotic L. casei culture. Putrescine concentration increased<br />

gradually during ripening and storage period, reaching levels<br />

5<strong>3.</strong>7 mg kg –1 (probiotic batch 1) and 16<strong>3.</strong>5 mg kg –1 (probio-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!