3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />
P61 ThE PROTEOMIC ANALySIS OF bARLEy<br />
ALbuMINS AND GLObuLINS<br />
MARKéTA LAŠTOVIČKOVá and JAnETTE<br />
BOBáľOVá<br />
Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the ASCR, v.v.i., 602 00<br />
Brno, Veveří 97, Czech Republic,<br />
lastovickova@iach.cz<br />
Introduction<br />
The proteins and glycoproteins play many important<br />
roles not only in nature, but also in technologies (e.g. food<br />
chemistry, medical technologies).<br />
The characterization of glycoproteins is not an easy task<br />
and several techniques have to be used for the resolving of<br />
their total chemical composition. Today, methods including<br />
gel electrophoresis, LC, and MS together with the database<br />
searches have been increasingly used. MS has become a widely<br />
used method in protein analysis after the invention of<br />
MALDI and electrospray ionization techniques 1 .<br />
Proteomics is increasingly used to address questions<br />
of development, physiology and quality of crop plants 2,3 .<br />
Modern analytical techniques are used for the characterization<br />
of cereal seed composition in order to increase basic<br />
knowledge about these plants for economical and nutritional<br />
aspects. One of the most important crops is barley (Hordeum<br />
Vulgare), which is used mainly for malting and animal feed 4 .<br />
The production of (glyco)proteins in barley seed is of particular<br />
interest, because this approach can be utilized to produce<br />
barley lines with improved properties, such as malting quality<br />
due to expression of thermotolerant enzymes 5 .<br />
Experimental<br />
e x t r a c t i o n o f P r o t e i n s<br />
The grains of malting barley (cultivar Jersey) were<br />
obtained from Research Institute of Brewing and Malting<br />
(Brno, Czech Republic). 250 mg of flour was mixed with<br />
2 ml of extraction reagent (TRIS buffer – 0.1 M, pH 7.8 containing<br />
0.5 M naCl; 1 mM MnCl 2 ; 1 mM CaCl 2 ) and shaken<br />
2 h. The suspension was centrifuged (20 min; 14,000 rpm).<br />
The supernatant containing the proteins was filtered using<br />
0.45 µm microfilter (Millipore) and used for the following<br />
experiments.<br />
A f f i n i t y C h r o m a t o g r a p h y ( A C )<br />
A glycoprotein enriched fraction was obtained by Concanavalin<br />
A (Con A) lectin chromatography (Calbiochem).<br />
4 ml of TRIS extract was applied on the column. Purified<br />
glycoproteins were released by 500 mM glucose.<br />
1 D - G E<br />
The proteins were separated by 12.5 % SDS gels. SDS-<br />
PAGE separations were performed on 16 × 14 cm gels (OWL<br />
SEPARATIOn SYSTEMS).The visualization was carried<br />
out by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (CBB).<br />
s709<br />
I n - G e l T r y p s i n D i g e s t i o n a n d M a s s<br />
S p e c t r o m e t r y<br />
The particular barley proteins and glycoproteins separated<br />
by 1-D GE were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion 6 .<br />
Peptides, obtained by trypsin digest, were analyzed by MS.<br />
MS experiments were carried out on an Applied Biosystems<br />
4700 Proteomics Analyzer mass spectrometer. α-Cyano-4hydroxycinnamic<br />
acid (10 mg m –1 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/<br />
acetonitrile (1 : 1, v/v)) was used as a matrix for MALDI-TOF<br />
MS analysis of peptides obtained by trypsin in-gel digestion.<br />
nitrogen was used as the collision gas for MS/MS experiments.<br />
Protein identification was performed by searching the<br />
peptide masses and MS/MS sequence stretches against the<br />
sequence databases using the MASCOT or ProFound search<br />
engines.<br />
Results<br />
This work was focused on the systematic proteomic<br />
study of barley grains. Barley was selected as a model sample<br />
because it contains a complex mixture of proteins and glycoproteins<br />
and has a lot of analogies in other plant materials.<br />
In general, it is not possible to identify the proteins<br />
without previous combination of MS with the separation<br />
techniques. Therefore especial attention was paid to the optimization<br />
of extractions and following separation methods.<br />
The different extraction reagents, selected on the basis of<br />
Osborn’s protein classification, were tested and obtained protein<br />
patterns were compared. Fig. 1. showed noticeable differences<br />
between individual extract. The attention was focused<br />
Fig. 1. Cbb stained 12.5 % 1-D SDS gel of barley proteins<br />
extracted by different extraction reagents. Lane 1 – molecular<br />
weight markers, Lane 2 – aqueous extract; Lane 3 – salt extract;<br />
Lane 4 – TRIS extract, Lane 5 – ethanol extract