22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P103 RELATIONShIP bETwEEN xANThOhuMOL,<br />

POLyPhENOLS, AND FLAVONOIDS CONTENT<br />

IN hOP LEAVES AND CONES wITh REGARD<br />

TO CuLTIVAR AND VEGETATION PERIOD<br />

eVA üRGEOVá, PETER KULACS, MáRIA VAŠKOVá<br />

and ľUDOVíT POLíVKA<br />

Department of Biotechnologies, Faculty of Natural Sciences,<br />

University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Nám. J.<br />

Herdu 2, 917 01 Trnava, Slovakia,<br />

eva.urgeova@ucm.sk<br />

Introduction<br />

Some secondary metabolites are present in plant cells<br />

in the form of precursors and are activated after pathogen attack<br />

1 . Secondary metabolites having biocide effect include<br />

isoprenoids, phenol substances, organic sulphur compounds,<br />

saponins, alkaloids, proteins, and peptides 2 .<br />

In this perspective, increasing attention is being paid to<br />

the plant called common hop (Humulus lupulus L.). The plant<br />

is diecious. Wild-growing hop grows on wet soils, mainly in<br />

riparian zones, in shrubberies, on the edges of canals and in<br />

similar places 3,4 . All the main components are contained in<br />

lupuline glands 3,5 , although some components, e.g. essential<br />

oils, were also identified in the leaves of the plant 6 . Concerning<br />

the chemical composition, hop resins are prenylated derivates<br />

of floroglucinol, comprising alpha-bitter acids and beta-bitter<br />

acids 5 . In recent years, antibiotic 7 , antifungal 8 , and antioxidant<br />

activities of humulone 9 have been identified. One of the<br />

big groups of substances contained in the hop plant is the<br />

group of polyphenol compounds 10 , phenol acids, chalkones,<br />

flavanols, flavonols, antocyanides, catechines and proantocyanides.<br />

Flavonoids as a group of organic compounds display<br />

a wide range of biological and pharmacological properties 11 ,<br />

including antiviral, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer<br />

properties 12,13 . Stevens 14 identified three main groups of<br />

flavonoids in the hop plant including prenylflavonoids. The<br />

content of prenylated flavonoids in the hop plant fluctuates<br />

between 0.2–0.6 % 15 . The chemical composition of hop is not<br />

constant; it changes with time and depends on the conditions<br />

of post-harvest storage 4,15 . Regarding the chemical composition,<br />

an important role was played by such factors as the plant<br />

development stage, location, growing practices, weather, and<br />

pressure of pathogens. Langezaal 6 reports that in hop leaves<br />

there are essential oils in much lower concentrations than<br />

in cones. To our knowledge, the content of low-molecular<br />

polyphenyls in hop leaves has not been studied yet.<br />

Experimental<br />

M a t e r i a l s a n d M e t h o d s<br />

We tested the samples of hop, cones and leaves taken<br />

from the Gene Bank of the Slovak Republic in the Institute<br />

of Plant Production, Piešťany (SCPV–VÚRV). The samples<br />

of different cultivars of hop were dried and homogenized.<br />

We used the following cultivars of hop: Osvald’s clones 31,<br />

(K-31), and 72 (K-72), Bor, Sládek, Aromat, Zlatan, and Pre-<br />

s810<br />

miant. We collected the samples before flowering and at the<br />

end of vegetal period.<br />

The content of phenol substances was determined by<br />

Singelton’s method 16 . The amount of 0.2 ml of methanol<br />

extract was mixed with l ml of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent<br />

and 0.8 ml of 7.5 % (w/v) na 2 CO 3 . Absorbance was measured<br />

at 750 nm wave-length after 30 minutes of incubation<br />

in dark. The content of polyphenols was compared with the<br />

absorbance of galic acid.<br />

Flavonoids were determined by Rakotoarison’s<br />

method 17 . 1 ml of methanol extract was added to 1 ml of methanol<br />

solution of AlCl 3 . 6H2 O, 2% (w/v), and absorbance was<br />

measured after 10 minutes at 394 nm. Quercetin was taken as<br />

the standard.<br />

Xanthohumol was determined by HPLC. Dry material<br />

was homogenized with methanol in a sonificator (Bandelin<br />

Electronic, Germany) for about 10 minutes, and then purified<br />

by centrifugation and filtration on a column (Waters, USA).<br />

Eluate (5 µl) was injected into the HPLC instrument and detected<br />

at 370 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 900 ml of<br />

methanol with 100 ml of water. The analytical column was<br />

nucleodur Sphinx RP EC 150/4.6 (5 µm). Xanthohumol was<br />

purchased form Sigma, Germany.<br />

Results<br />

The concentration ranges of phenol substances, flavonoids<br />

and xanthohumol in hop cultivated in the Slovak Republic<br />

are summarized. The content of polyphenols and flavonoids<br />

was monitored during the vegetal period of plant growth. All<br />

cultivars showed different contents of secondary metabolites<br />

during the vegetal period, their content in leaves decreased<br />

from the end of June to September (Table I).<br />

Table I<br />

Polyphenols content in hop leaves during the vegetal period<br />

Cultivar Polyphenols [mg g –1 DM]<br />

06/07 * 09/07 *<br />

K-31 8.83 1.22<br />

Bor 5.00 2.25<br />

Sládek 5.76 2.04<br />

K-72 7.46 0.99<br />

Aromat 6.56 0.98<br />

Premiant 5.52 0.90<br />

Zlatan 6.23 1.82<br />

* 06/07 and 09/07 – date of sampling<br />

Phenol substances were in the interval between<br />

0.90–2.25 mg g –1 of dry matter in leaves, and from 4.0 to<br />

21.1 mg g –1 of dry matter in cones (Table II) at the end of the<br />

vegetal period.<br />

The content of polyphenols was dependent on the type<br />

of cultivar and on climatic conditions as well. Comparison<br />

of the contents of polyphenols in extracts from hop cones in<br />

2006 and 2007 is shown in Fig. 1. The content of phenol substances<br />

in leaves did not basically relate to the content of phe-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!