22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P102 DyNAMICS OF SELECTED PESTICIDES<br />

APPLIED TO APPLE PROTECTION DuRING<br />

PRE-hARVEST AND POST-hARVEST PERIOD<br />

JAnA URBAnOVá a , OnDřEJ LACInA a , JAKUB<br />

SCHůREK a , MIROSLAV LánSKý b and JAnA<br />

HAJŠLOVá a<br />

a Department of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Institute of<br />

Chemical Technology in Prague, Technicka 3, Prague 6,<br />

166 28, Czech Republic,<br />

b Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology, Holovousy,<br />

Czech Republic,<br />

jana.hajslova@vscht.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

Pesticides represent an important group of agrochemicals<br />

used for food crop protection. However, their residues<br />

can often be detected in treated crops at the harvest time.<br />

Because of the health hazard, this issue is of high concern,<br />

mainly when crops containing residues are intended for baby<br />

food production. Infants and young children are the most vulnerable<br />

group of human population; therefore, uniform maximum<br />

residue limit (MRL) 0.01 mg kg –1 has been established<br />

in EU for any pesticide residue occurring in processed baby<br />

food. Currently, most of producers require raw materials<br />

complying with this (low) residue limit, although it applies to<br />

processed product. Under real-life conditions, this may pose<br />

a problem, since many pesticide preparations even when used<br />

in accordance with Good Agriculture Practice (GAP) may<br />

leave residues exceeding the “baby food” MRL 1 .<br />

Table I<br />

Schedule of the pre-harvest treatment<br />

Application date<br />

Pesticide preparation/<br />

dosage [per hectare]<br />

s807<br />

Apples are the key raw material for production of fruitbased<br />

baby food. Unfortunately apples can be attacked by<br />

various disorders not only during pre-harvest period but also<br />

during storage. Sometimes incipient infection is too small to<br />

be seen prior to fruit storage but may develop under favourable<br />

conditions (high humidity) as a result of sporulation<br />

from older lesions. Particular treatment strategy should be<br />

applied to apples intended for storage because the decline of<br />

pesticide residues within a post-harvest time might be slower<br />

(depending on the storage conditions) than during the preharvest<br />

period when the drop is relatively rapid due to various<br />

environmental factors 2 .<br />

Experimental<br />

F i e l d E x p e r i m e n t s<br />

Four different apple varieties, Golden Delicious, Gloster,<br />

Idared and Melrose, were examined in this study. The<br />

same treatment schedule was applied to all studied varieties.<br />

The overview of pesticide preparations and some relevant<br />

characteristics of active ingredients are listed in Table I.<br />

In the first phase, the experimental apple trees obtained<br />

specific pesticide treatment from April to June, see Table I. In<br />

the second phase, the orchard was divided into four sections<br />

(S1–S4). In the S1 no pesticides were used, while in S2–S4,<br />

fungicides against storage pests were applied according to the<br />

scheme shown in Table II.<br />

The first set of samples was taken for analysis at the time<br />

of harvest (October 10, 2007) and the next two after three<br />

(January 8, 2008) and five (March 19, 2008) months of cold<br />

storage (1–3 ºC).<br />

Active ingredient Mode of action Safety period [days]<br />

April 12, 2007 Chorus 75 WG/0.2 kg cyprodinil fungicide 28<br />

Cascade 5 EC/1.5 kg flufenoxuron insecticide -<br />

April 19, 2007 Clarinet 20 SC/1.5 dm 3 fluquinconazole fungicide 28<br />

pyrimethanil fungicide<br />

April 26, 2007 Thiram Granulo/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg thiram fungicide 14<br />

May 3, 2007 Dithane neotec/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg mancozeb fungicide 21<br />

Calypso 480 SC/0.2 dm 3 thiacloprid insecticide 14<br />

May 11, 2007 Delan 700 WDG/0.6 dm 3 dithianon fungicide 21<br />

Score 250 EC/0.2 dm 3 difenoconazole fungicide 49<br />

May 18, 2007 Polyram WG/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg metiram fungicide 21<br />

Insegar 25 WP/0.3 kg fenoxycarb insecticide 60<br />

May 25, 2007 Integro/0.5 dm 3 methoxyfenozide insecticide 14<br />

June 1, 2007<br />

Baycor 25 WP/1.0 kg<br />

Score 250 EC/0.2 dm<br />

bitertanol fungicide 35<br />

3 difenoconatole fungicide 49<br />

June 7, 2007 Domark 10 EC/0.4 dm3 tetraconazole fungicide 14<br />

June 14, 2007 Syllit 400 SC/1.7 dm3 Trebon 10 EW/0.5 dm<br />

dodine fungicide 21<br />

3 etofenprox insecticide 28<br />

June 26, 2007 Mythos 30 SC/1.0 dm3 Mospilan 20 SP/0.25 kg<br />

pyrimethanil<br />

acetamiprid<br />

fungicide<br />

insecticide<br />

28<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!