22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

Table II<br />

Schedule of the treatment against storage diseases<br />

Code<br />

Pesticide preparation [kg ha –1 ]<br />

Application date<br />

active ingredient – safety period<br />

S1 – –<br />

S2<br />

Delan 700 WG (0.7)<br />

dithianon – 21 days<br />

September 19, 2007<br />

S3<br />

Thiram Granuflo (<strong>3.</strong>0)<br />

thiram – 14 days<br />

September 26, 2007<br />

S4<br />

Zato 50 WG (0.15)<br />

trifloxystrobin – 14 days<br />

September 26, 2007<br />

A n a l y t i c a l M e t h o d s<br />

Most of pesticides were liquid chromatography (LC)<br />

amenable, so for isolation of 14 from 17 examined analytes<br />

the QuEChERS method 3 was applied. Crude extract (without<br />

cleanup step realized with primary-secondary amine (PSA))<br />

was examined by LC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry<br />

(MS/MS). Limits of quantitation (LOQ) for these<br />

pesticides were 0.002 mg kg –1 , only for dodine LOQ was<br />

0.005 mg kg –1 . Ethylenbisdithiocarbamates (EBDC), in this<br />

study represented by mancozeb, metiram and thiram, were<br />

determined as a sum by solid phase micro-extraction (SPME)<br />

of their degradation product (carbon disulfide), identification/<br />

quantitation was performed by gas chromatography coupled<br />

with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), LOQ was 0.001 mg kg –1 .<br />

s808<br />

Results<br />

At the time of harvest, residues of some pesticides (acetamiprid,<br />

cyprodinil, flufenoxuron, fluquinconazole, fenoxycarb,<br />

tetraconazole and thiacloprid) used for treatment<br />

(Table I) were not detected. Other pesticides exceeding the<br />

method LOQ could be grouped into three categories based<br />

on their concentration levels: (i) compounds with residues<br />

below 0.01 mg kg –1 at the time of harvest (i.e. difenoconazole,<br />

dithianon, methoxyfenozide, EBDC), (ii) compounds with<br />

residues exceeding the “baby food” limit at the harvest time,<br />

but declining below the limit at the end of the storage period<br />

(i.e. bitertanol, etofenprox) and (iii) compounds with residues<br />

not significantly declining and exceeding the 0.01 mg kg –1 all<br />

the time (i.e. dodine, pyrimethanil). no generalization on the<br />

relationship between residues dynamics and apple variety<br />

could be drawn. The highest amount of bitertanol residues<br />

occurred in variety Golden Delicious (Fig. 1. A) and etofenprox<br />

residues was the highest in variety Idared (Fig. 1. B) in<br />

all experiments. Worth to notice that the changes of pesticides<br />

classified as concentration category (iii) were not dependent<br />

on apple variety.<br />

Treatment for post-harvest disease protection was carried<br />

out before the harvest in compliance with required safety<br />

period. For this purpose three fungicide preparations with<br />

different active ingredients (dithianon, thiram and trifloxystrobin)<br />

were tested (Table II). Thiram, although applied only<br />

14 days before the harvest, did not exceed “baby food” limit,<br />

Fig. 1. The dynamics of selected pesticides during cold storage (1–3 ºC); A: bitertanol, B: etofenprox, C: trifloxystrobin,<br />

D: dithianon

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!