22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P88 MONITORING OF MERCuRy CONTENT<br />

IN ThE <strong>FOOD</strong> bASKET FOR ThE CZECh<br />

POPuLATION DuRING 1994–2007<br />

J. řEHáKOVá, I. řEHůřKOVá, J. RUPRICH, J<br />

KALVODOVá and D. MATULOVá<br />

National Institute of Public Health – Centre for the Hygiene<br />

of Food Chains, Palackého 3a, Brno 612 42 Czech Republic,<br />

rehakova@chpr.szu.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

Mercury belongs to group of heavy metals. In nature<br />

mercury can be found in various forms (organic and inorganic<br />

compounds, elementary Hg 0 ) with different toxicity. For<br />

human organism all mercury forms can be toxic. The most<br />

important and the most danger forms are alkyl-mercury compounds<br />

like methylmercury (MeHg) and inorganic compound<br />

like Hg 2+ . The hazard is connected also with cumulative properties<br />

of mercury. The highest concentrations are measured<br />

in kidneys, liver and spleen.<br />

Less frequent acute intoxication causes vomit, diarrhea<br />

and abdominal ache. More important is a risk of chronic intoxication.<br />

Exposure can lead to cerebral paralysis, cephalonia,<br />

deafness, blindness and high blood pressure (Minamata<br />

disease) 1 . MeHg as the most danger mercury form comes through<br />

blood-brain barrier and via placenta can be transported<br />

into fetal brain.<br />

Main exposure routes for mercury are inhalation and<br />

digestion... Disputative question is long-term influence of<br />

amalgam fillings. Mercury is very well absorbed after oral<br />

exposure (95 % MeHg is absorbed). Due to potential health<br />

risks it is necessary to monitor the mercury content in foodstuffs<br />

of vegetable and as well as animal origin. Plants and<br />

animal contamination can be caused by growing in contaminated<br />

environment (industry wastes and exhalation). Important<br />

source of mercury exposure especially in seaside countries<br />

are fish.<br />

Many studies have been published about the determination<br />

of mercury in foods. Centre for the Hygiene of Food<br />

Chains in Brno has been involved in the monitoring of the<br />

content of total mercury in foods (see “The Project on Dietary<br />

Exposure of the Czech Population to Selected Chemical Substances”<br />

2,3 ). This project has been started in 1994 and the<br />

third period runs in this time. The aim of this monitoring<br />

programme is an assessment of dietary exposure, comparison<br />

with toxicological reference points, and characterization of<br />

health risks. To achieve these goals it is necessary to perform<br />

a systematic monitoring of the mercury content in the food<br />

basket of the Czech population as well as to know consumption<br />

of individual foods.<br />

This work summarizes the mercury content found in<br />

individual foods in our laboratory during past 14 years. Also<br />

their contribution to the total dietary exposure and validation<br />

by using of biomarkers are included.<br />

s777<br />

Methodology<br />

The analyzed foods were selected according to the<br />

knowledge of their consumption by the average person in<br />

the Czech population 4,5 . In total 143 kinds of foodstuffs were<br />

selected and studied in specific time periods. Food samples<br />

were collected in 4 regions (12 sampling towns) and delivered<br />

to Centre of Hygiene of Food Chains in Brno. This<br />

organization represents 572 food samples that have been processed<br />

during two-year period. Some kind of foodstuffs (more<br />

frequently consumed) are sampled repeatedly and measured<br />

every year (e.g. milk or potatoes even 2 × per year and town),<br />

others (less frequently consumed) are sampled and measured<br />

only once in the whole two-years period. In total 880 individual<br />

samples were measured in this period. After delivery of<br />

samples into the Centre of Hygiene of Food Chains in Brno,<br />

the samples undergo the culinary treatment in pre-analytical<br />

laboratory so that they are analyzed in the same state as they<br />

are consumed. The samples are then homogenized and delivered<br />

into the central analytical laboratory for further treatment<br />

and analyses.<br />

In analytical laboratory mercury content (as a total<br />

mercury) is determined by AAS method using principle of<br />

selective system AMA 254 with solid sample dosing without<br />

previous analytical preparation. Optimized method provides<br />

adequate sensitivity for the determination of the mercury in<br />

foods. The limit of quantification is 0.1 μg kg –1 for a minimal<br />

sample weight 200 mg. The degree of recovery ranged from<br />

95 to 105 %. The RSD of repeatability does not exceed 10 %.<br />

This method is accredited according to ČSn En ISO/IEC<br />

17025:2005. To ensure accuracy of the results matrix reference<br />

materials as well as various internal test materials are<br />

used. In addition our laboratory participates in proficiency<br />

testing (FAPAS, IMEP etc.).<br />

Results<br />

The content of total mercury was monitored in 143 kinds<br />

of food representing so called food basket of the Czech<br />

population. Based on previous experience only fifteen kinds<br />

of food with the highest measured mercury content were<br />

selected and visualized in Fig. 1. This figure shows foods<br />

with their corresponding concentration values. The dietary<br />

exposure is influenced not only by the content of mercury in<br />

the given food, but also by the quantity of consumed foods<br />

To calculate the dietary exposure doses it is also necessary<br />

to take into account the changes caused by the culinary treatment<br />

of the given food which are described by the so called<br />

culinary factor 3 . The influence of both the consumption and<br />

culinary factor on the final exposure dose is demonstrated by<br />

the following figure. The fifteen most significant exposure<br />

sources of total mercury are given in Fig. 2. In both figures<br />

(1.,2.) concentration data are used from the last monitoring<br />

period 2006–2007.<br />

Foodstuffs listed in Fig. 1. and Fig. 2. are traditionally<br />

highlighted in first places during whole period of monitoring<br />

program (1994–2007). Fig. <strong>3.</strong> shows the changes in measured<br />

content of total mercury [μg kg –1 ] in five selected most

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!