3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />
P88 MONITORING OF MERCuRy CONTENT<br />
IN ThE <strong>FOOD</strong> bASKET FOR ThE CZECh<br />
POPuLATION DuRING 1994–2007<br />
J. řEHáKOVá, I. řEHůřKOVá, J. RUPRICH, J<br />
KALVODOVá and D. MATULOVá<br />
National Institute of Public Health – Centre for the Hygiene<br />
of Food Chains, Palackého 3a, Brno 612 42 Czech Republic,<br />
rehakova@chpr.szu.cz<br />
Introduction<br />
Mercury belongs to group of heavy metals. In nature<br />
mercury can be found in various forms (organic and inorganic<br />
compounds, elementary Hg 0 ) with different toxicity. For<br />
human organism all mercury forms can be toxic. The most<br />
important and the most danger forms are alkyl-mercury compounds<br />
like methylmercury (MeHg) and inorganic compound<br />
like Hg 2+ . The hazard is connected also with cumulative properties<br />
of mercury. The highest concentrations are measured<br />
in kidneys, liver and spleen.<br />
Less frequent acute intoxication causes vomit, diarrhea<br />
and abdominal ache. More important is a risk of chronic intoxication.<br />
Exposure can lead to cerebral paralysis, cephalonia,<br />
deafness, blindness and high blood pressure (Minamata<br />
disease) 1 . MeHg as the most danger mercury form comes through<br />
blood-brain barrier and via placenta can be transported<br />
into fetal brain.<br />
Main exposure routes for mercury are inhalation and<br />
digestion... Disputative question is long-term influence of<br />
amalgam fillings. Mercury is very well absorbed after oral<br />
exposure (95 % MeHg is absorbed). Due to potential health<br />
risks it is necessary to monitor the mercury content in foodstuffs<br />
of vegetable and as well as animal origin. Plants and<br />
animal contamination can be caused by growing in contaminated<br />
environment (industry wastes and exhalation). Important<br />
source of mercury exposure especially in seaside countries<br />
are fish.<br />
Many studies have been published about the determination<br />
of mercury in foods. Centre for the Hygiene of Food<br />
Chains in Brno has been involved in the monitoring of the<br />
content of total mercury in foods (see “The Project on Dietary<br />
Exposure of the Czech Population to Selected Chemical Substances”<br />
2,3 ). This project has been started in 1994 and the<br />
third period runs in this time. The aim of this monitoring<br />
programme is an assessment of dietary exposure, comparison<br />
with toxicological reference points, and characterization of<br />
health risks. To achieve these goals it is necessary to perform<br />
a systematic monitoring of the mercury content in the food<br />
basket of the Czech population as well as to know consumption<br />
of individual foods.<br />
This work summarizes the mercury content found in<br />
individual foods in our laboratory during past 14 years. Also<br />
their contribution to the total dietary exposure and validation<br />
by using of biomarkers are included.<br />
s777<br />
Methodology<br />
The analyzed foods were selected according to the<br />
knowledge of their consumption by the average person in<br />
the Czech population 4,5 . In total 143 kinds of foodstuffs were<br />
selected and studied in specific time periods. Food samples<br />
were collected in 4 regions (12 sampling towns) and delivered<br />
to Centre of Hygiene of Food Chains in Brno. This<br />
organization represents 572 food samples that have been processed<br />
during two-year period. Some kind of foodstuffs (more<br />
frequently consumed) are sampled repeatedly and measured<br />
every year (e.g. milk or potatoes even 2 × per year and town),<br />
others (less frequently consumed) are sampled and measured<br />
only once in the whole two-years period. In total 880 individual<br />
samples were measured in this period. After delivery of<br />
samples into the Centre of Hygiene of Food Chains in Brno,<br />
the samples undergo the culinary treatment in pre-analytical<br />
laboratory so that they are analyzed in the same state as they<br />
are consumed. The samples are then homogenized and delivered<br />
into the central analytical laboratory for further treatment<br />
and analyses.<br />
In analytical laboratory mercury content (as a total<br />
mercury) is determined by AAS method using principle of<br />
selective system AMA 254 with solid sample dosing without<br />
previous analytical preparation. Optimized method provides<br />
adequate sensitivity for the determination of the mercury in<br />
foods. The limit of quantification is 0.1 μg kg –1 for a minimal<br />
sample weight 200 mg. The degree of recovery ranged from<br />
95 to 105 %. The RSD of repeatability does not exceed 10 %.<br />
This method is accredited according to ČSn En ISO/IEC<br />
17025:2005. To ensure accuracy of the results matrix reference<br />
materials as well as various internal test materials are<br />
used. In addition our laboratory participates in proficiency<br />
testing (FAPAS, IMEP etc.).<br />
Results<br />
The content of total mercury was monitored in 143 kinds<br />
of food representing so called food basket of the Czech<br />
population. Based on previous experience only fifteen kinds<br />
of food with the highest measured mercury content were<br />
selected and visualized in Fig. 1. This figure shows foods<br />
with their corresponding concentration values. The dietary<br />
exposure is influenced not only by the content of mercury in<br />
the given food, but also by the quantity of consumed foods<br />
To calculate the dietary exposure doses it is also necessary<br />
to take into account the changes caused by the culinary treatment<br />
of the given food which are described by the so called<br />
culinary factor 3 . The influence of both the consumption and<br />
culinary factor on the final exposure dose is demonstrated by<br />
the following figure. The fifteen most significant exposure<br />
sources of total mercury are given in Fig. 2. In both figures<br />
(1.,2.) concentration data are used from the last monitoring<br />
period 2006–2007.<br />
Foodstuffs listed in Fig. 1. and Fig. 2. are traditionally<br />
highlighted in first places during whole period of monitoring<br />
program (1994–2007). Fig. <strong>3.</strong> shows the changes in measured<br />
content of total mercury [μg kg –1 ] in five selected most