06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244 Chapter Three. Maps Between Spaces<br />

̌ 2.34 Represent the identity transformation id: V → V with respect to B, B for any<br />

basis B. Thisistheidentity matrix I. Show that this matrix plays the role in matrix<br />

multiplication that the number 1 plays in real number multiplication: HI = IH = H<br />

(for all matrices H for which the product is defined).<br />

2.35 (a) Prove that for any 2×2 matrix T there are scalars c 0 ,...,c 4 that are not<br />

all 0 such that the combination c 4 T 4 + c 3 T 3 + c 2 T 2 + c 1 T + c 0 I is the zero matrix<br />

(where I is the 2×2 identity matrix, with 1’s in its 1, 1 and 2, 2 entries and zeroes<br />

elsewhere; see Exercise 34).<br />

(b) Let p(x) be a polynomial p(x) =c n x n + ··· + c 1 x + c 0 . If T is a square<br />

matrix we define p(T) to be the matrix c n T n + ···+ c 1 T + c 0 I (where I is the<br />

appropriately-sized identity matrix). Prove that for any square matrix there is a<br />

polynomial such that p(T) is the zero matrix.<br />

(c) The minimal polynomial m(x) of a square matrix is the polynomial of least<br />

degree, and with leading coefficient 1, such that m(T) is the zero matrix. Find<br />

the minimal polynomial of this matrix.<br />

(√ )<br />

3/2<br />

√ −1/2<br />

1/2 3/2<br />

(This is the representation with respect to E 2 , E 2 , the standard basis, of a rotation<br />

through π/6 radians counterclockwise.)<br />

2.36 The infinite-dimensional space P of all finite-degree polynomials gives a memorable<br />

example of the non-commutativity of linear maps. Let d/dx: P → P be the<br />

usual derivative and let s: P → P be the shift map.<br />

a 0 + a 1 x + ···+ a n x n<br />

s<br />

↦−→ 0 + a 0 x + a 1 x 2 + ···+ a n x n+1<br />

Show that the two maps don’t commute d/dx ◦ s ≠ s ◦ d/dx; in fact, not only is<br />

(d/dx ◦ s)−(s ◦ d/dx) not the zero map, it is the identity map.<br />

2.37 Recall the notation for the sum of the sequence of numbers a 1 ,a 2 ,...,a n .<br />

n∑<br />

a i = a 1 + a 2 + ···+ a n<br />

i=1<br />

In this notation, the i, j entry of the product of G and H is this.<br />

r∑<br />

p i,j = g i,k h k,j<br />

k=1<br />

Using this notation,<br />

(a) reprove that matrix multiplication is associative;<br />

(b) reprove Theorem 2.7.<br />

IV.3<br />

Mechanics of Matrix Multiplication<br />

We can consider matrix multiplication as a mechanical process, putting aside for<br />

the moment any implications about the underlying maps.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!