06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section II. Similarity 407<br />

̌ 1.13 [Halmos] Are there two matrices A and B that are similar while A 2 and B 2 are<br />

not similar?<br />

̌ 1.14 Prove that if two matrices are similar and one is invertible then so is the other.<br />

1.15 Show that similarity is an equivalence relation. (The definition given earlier<br />

already reflects this, so instead start here with the definition that ˆT is similar to T<br />

if ˆT = PTP −1 .)<br />

1.16 Consider a matrix representing, with respect to some B, B, reflection across<br />

the x-axis in R 2 . Consider also a matrix representing, with respect to some D, D,<br />

reflection across the y-axis. Must they be similar?<br />

1.17 Prove that matrix similarity preserves rank and determinant. Does the converse<br />

hold?<br />

1.18 Is there a matrix equivalence class with only one matrix similarity class inside?<br />

One with infinitely many similarity classes?<br />

1.19 Can two different diagonal matrices be in the same similarity class?<br />

̌ 1.20 Prove that if two matrices are similar then their k-th powers are similar when<br />

k>0. What if k 0?<br />

̌ 1.21 Let p(x) be the polynomial c n x n + ···+ c 1 x + c 0 . Show that if T is similar to<br />

S then p(T) =c n T n + ···+ c 1 T + c 0 I is similar to p(S) =c n S n + ···+ c 1 S + c 0 I.<br />

1.22 List all of the matrix equivalence classes of 1×1 matrices. Also list the similarity<br />

classes, and describe which similarity classes are contained inside of each matrix<br />

equivalence class.<br />

1.23 Does similarity preserve sums?<br />

1.24 Show that if T − λI and N are similar matrices then T and N + λI are also<br />

similar.<br />

II.2<br />

Diagonalizability<br />

The prior subsection shows that although similar matrices are necessarily matrix<br />

equivalent, the converse does not hold. Some matrix equivalence classes break<br />

into two or more similarity classes; for instance, the nonsingular 2×2 matrices<br />

form one matrix equivalence class but more than one similarity class.<br />

The diagram below illustrates. Solid curves show the matrix equivalence<br />

classes while dashed dividers mark the similarity classes. Each star is a matrix<br />

representing its similarity class. We cannot use the canonical form for matrix<br />

equivalence, a block partial-identity matrix, as a canonical form for similarity<br />

because each matrix equivalence class has only one partial identity matrix.<br />

⋆ ⋆⋆<br />

⋆<br />

⋆<br />

⋆<br />

⋆ ⋆ ⋆<br />

...

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!