06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58 Chapter One. <strong>Linear</strong> Systems<br />

We now have the insight that Gauss’s Method builds linear combinations<br />

of the rows. But of course its goal is to end in echelon form, since that is a<br />

particularly basic version of a linear system, as it has isolated the variables. For<br />

instance, in this matrix<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

2 3 7 8 0 0<br />

0 0 1 5 1 1<br />

R = ⎜<br />

⎟<br />

⎝0 0 0 3 3 0⎠<br />

0 0 0 0 2 1<br />

x 1 has been removed from x 5 ’s equation. That is, Gauss’s Method has made<br />

x 5 ’s row in some way independent of x 1 ’s row.<br />

The following result makes this intuition precise. We sometimes refer to<br />

Gauss’s Method as Gaussian elimination. What it eliminates is linear relationships<br />

among the rows.<br />

2.5 Lemma In an echelon form matrix, no nonzero row is a linear combination<br />

of the other nonzero rows.<br />

Proof Let R be an echelon form matrix and consider its non-⃗0 rows. First<br />

observe that if we have a row written as a combination of the others ⃗ρ i =<br />

c 1 ⃗ρ 1 +···+c i−1 ⃗ρ i−1 +c i+1 ⃗ρ i+1 +···+c m ⃗ρ m then we can rewrite that equation<br />

as<br />

⃗0 = c 1 ⃗ρ 1 + ···+ c i−1 ⃗ρ i−1 + c i ⃗ρ i + c i+1 ⃗ρ i+1 + ···+ c m ⃗ρ m (∗)<br />

where not all the coefficients are zero; specifically, c i =−1. The converse holds<br />

also: given equation (∗) where some c i ≠ 0 we could express ⃗ρ i as a combination<br />

of the other rows by moving c i ⃗ρ i to the left and dividing by −c i . Therefore we<br />

will have proved the theorem if we show that in (∗) all of the coefficients are 0.<br />

For that we use induction on the row number i.<br />

The base case is the first row i = 1 (if there is no such nonzero row, so that<br />

R is the zero matrix, then the lemma holds vacuously). Let l i be the column<br />

number of the leading entry in row i. Consider the entry of each row that is in<br />

column l 1 . Equation (∗) gives this.<br />

0 = c 1 r 1,l1 + c 2 r 2,l1 + ···+ c m r m,l1 (∗∗)<br />

The matrix is in echelon form so every row after the first has a zero entry in that<br />

column r 2,l1 = ···= r m,l1 = 0. Thus equation (∗∗) shows that c 1 = 0, because<br />

r 1,l1 ≠ 0 as it leads the row.<br />

The inductive step is much the same as the base step. Again consider<br />

equation (∗). We will prove that if the coefficient c i is 0 for each row index<br />

i ∈ {1,...,k} then c k+1 is also 0. We focus on the entries from column l k+1 .<br />

0 = c 1 r 1,lk+1 + ···+ c k+1 r k+1,lk+1 + ···+ c m r m,lk+1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!