06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section I. Definition 349<br />

Thus, in aggregate, the number of inversions changes from even to odd, or from<br />

oddtoeven.<br />

QED<br />

4.5 Corollary If a permutation matrix has an odd number of inversions then<br />

swapping it to the identity takes an odd number of swaps. If it has an even<br />

number of inversions then swapping to the identity takes an even number.<br />

Proof The identity matrix has zero inversions. To change an odd number to<br />

zero requires an odd number of swaps, and to change an even number to zero<br />

requires an even number of swaps.<br />

QED<br />

4.6 Example The matrix in Example 4.3 can be brought to the identity with one<br />

swap ρ 1 ↔ ρ 3 . (So the number of swaps needn’t be the same as the number of<br />

inversions, but the oddness or evenness of the two numbers is the same.)<br />

4.7 Definition The signum of a permutation sgn(φ) is −1 if the number of<br />

inversions in φ is odd and is +1 if the number of inversions is even.<br />

4.8 Example Using the notation for the 3-permutations from Example 3.8 we<br />

have<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

1 0 0<br />

⎞<br />

⎛<br />

⎟<br />

⎜<br />

1 0 0<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

P φ1 = ⎝0 1 0⎠ P φ2 = ⎝0 0 1⎠<br />

0 0 1<br />

0 1 0<br />

so sgn(φ 1 )=1 because there are no inversions, while sgn(φ 2 )=−1 because<br />

there is one.<br />

We still have not shown that the determinant function is well-defined because<br />

we have not considered row operations on permutation matrices other than row<br />

swaps. We will finesse this issue. Define a function d: M n×n → R by altering<br />

the permutation expansion formula, replacing |P φ | with sgn(φ).<br />

d(T) =<br />

∑<br />

permutations φ<br />

t 1,φ(1) t 2,φ(2) ···t n,φ(n) · sgn(φ)<br />

The advantage of this formula is that the number of inversions is clearly welldefined<br />

— just count them. Therefore, we will be finished showing that an n×n<br />

determinant function exists when we show that d satisfies the conditions in the<br />

definition of a determinant.<br />

4.9 Lemma The function d above is a determinant. Hence determinant functions<br />

det n×n exist for every n.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!