06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

Linear Algebra, 2020a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Topic: Cramer’s Rule 371<br />

x − y = 4 −2x + y =−2<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

−x + 2y =−7 x − 2y =−2<br />

2 Use Cramer’s Rule to solve this system for z.<br />

2x + y + z = 1<br />

3x + z = 4<br />

x − y − z = 2<br />

3 Prove Cramer’s Rule.<br />

4 Here is an alternative proof of Cramer’s Rule that doesn’t overtly contain any<br />

geometry. Write X i for the identity matrix with column i replaced by the vector ⃗x<br />

of unknowns x 1 , ..., x n .<br />

(a) Observe that AX i = B i .<br />

(b) Take the determinant of both sides.<br />

5 Suppose that a linear system has as many equations as unknowns, that all of<br />

its coefficients and constants are integers, and that its matrix of coefficients has<br />

determinant 1. Prove that the entries in the solution are all integers. (Remark.<br />

This is often used to invent linear systems for exercises.)<br />

6 Use Cramer’s Rule to give a formula for the solution of a two equations/two<br />

unknowns linear system.<br />

7 Can Cramer’s Rule tell the difference between a system with no solutions and one<br />

with infinitely many?<br />

8 The first picture in this Topic (the one that doesn’t use determinants) shows a<br />

unique solution case. Produce a similar picture for the case of infinitely many<br />

solutions, and the case of no solutions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!