31.12.2012 Views

Volltext - ub-dok: der Dokumentenserver der UB Trier - Universität ...

Volltext - ub-dok: der Dokumentenserver der UB Trier - Universität ...

Volltext - ub-dok: der Dokumentenserver der UB Trier - Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the message of the destruction of this world and creation of the next. The wayang kulit sense<br />

of being is that the two sides of the screen express differing levels of reality, and Koch’s<br />

purposes here, as throughout his novels, are to demonstrate the unsharpness in the lines of<br />

tangentiality between the worlds of s<strong>ub</strong>stance and imagination, making it extremely difficult<br />

sometimes to know into which world one has tread.<br />

The second problem is the logical end of Pons’ argument that Billy Kwan’s life and<br />

death were sterile. The validity of Pons’ argument is assured only as long as it is limited to the<br />

vocabulary of Western critical tradition. Pons makes no accounting at all for Asian influences,<br />

and for the good reason that they would contradict the Oedipal thesis. Wally O’Sullivan,<br />

Kevin Condon and others, perhaps even Cookie, and many of Blanche d’Alpuget’s characters,<br />

can surely be analysed according to this formula, but only because they exemplify expatriate<br />

Westerners in Asia. As soon as the characters move into new directions, absorbing the myths<br />

and symbols of the East as do Hamilton, Kwan, Alex Wheatfield, and Mike Langford, then<br />

they surpass purely Western analysis; their uncovered Eastern sides must be taken into<br />

account. From an Eastern point of view, Pons’ statements about Kwan’s ‘phallic power’,<br />

‘castration’ and ‘virility’ are quite simply illustrations of how man is blinded by the illusory<br />

quality of nature.<br />

Pons tries to pre-empt complaints of these critical limitations by claiming for his thesis<br />

place as one interpretation among many contributing to un<strong>der</strong>standing a complex work of art<br />

(Pons, 117). One cannot argue against this, though it is imperative to signal the misleading<br />

implications of Pons paper, especially in view of the corpus of criticism outlined in sections<br />

8.2.1 and 8.2.2, which have looked at the problems of judging C. J. Koch according to<br />

exclusively Western or Eastern traditions. The next section highlights criticism which<br />

recognises the need to take both into consi<strong>der</strong>ation.<br />

8.2.3. A Mischievous Synthesis of Eastern and Western Myth<br />

In his analysis of Koch’s hybridised semiotics, D. M. Roskies describes how the<br />

narrator, Cookie, with his vast array of information, from Hamilton’s accounts, the other<br />

- 158 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!