08.01.2013 Views

Rt€@lll

Rt€@lll

Rt€@lll

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-19<br />

AGRICULTURE' slzE AND DIsTAtlcE IN SOUTH PActFIc ISLAND FUTURES<br />

R. Gerard Werd<br />

Research School of pacifie Studies<br />

Australian National University<br />

Canberra, Australia<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Agriculture is usually considered Eo be the keystone of Pacific Island<br />

economies- This paper examines the scope for developrnent of various agricultural<br />

systems within the Pacific Islands.<br />

The effeets which small size, insularity and distance from markets and sources<br />

of inputs all have m the agricultural potential of the islands are considered.<br />

The Pacific Island States include the worldrs smallest independent or semi-independent<br />

countries in terms of population. They also include some of the smallest in land area; some of<br />

the largest if their Exclusive Eeonomic Zones are included; some of the most isolated; and<br />

some of the most fr-agmented and dispersed. These features all bear on the agricuitural<br />

resources of the Pacific islands; on the assessrnent of them, and on their use potentials.<br />

ln this paper I will outline the general pattern of resource potentials in the regionl<br />

describe the agricultural systems through which these resources were used in the i".t;<br />

indicate some trends in the commercial and non-commercial segnnnts of agriculture todayi<br />

and zuggest the directions which agricultural resource use is lkLly to take in the next few<br />

decades. Small size, both of individual islands and states, and great distances, both between<br />

islands and states' and from markets and sources of importe witl obviously influence these<br />

directions.<br />

Resource potentials<br />

It is important to recognize a basic division between the larger Pacific Islands Statea,<br />

the Melanesian States of Fiji, New Caledonia, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands m the one handi<br />

and the smaller, Polynesian or Micronesian states m the other. The former have larger hnj<br />

areas and rnore varied landforms. Their range of elevation and exposure give climatic variety.<br />

Their surface water resources are greater and rmre secure. Their fish rlsources are greater<br />

as a result of their wider areas of shallow seas, and with both denrersal end pelagic $ecies,<br />

they have greater potential for artisanal and industrial fieheriee. Fmest resources are rxrre<br />

extensive and there is greater variety in landforms, climete and soils.<br />

Tfe atolls of Kiribati, Tuvalu, Tokelau, the Northern Coks end the Tuemotus lack<br />

surface water, have little soil, and lie exposed to the risk of teunami or hurricane. Tfeir<br />

range of crops is inevitably narrow. Even m the higher volcenic iglends of polynesia, the<br />

flora and faune ere less varied than in the western pacitic and the variety of environrental<br />

conditions more restricted.<br />

It may be argued thet thig eontrast in environnental variety was of timited aignificance<br />

in<br />

.<br />

creating inequality in opportunity in the socio-econornic ayslem. of pre-contact timea.<br />

With eome obvious qualifications, a relatively narrow range of ctopa was grown throughout<br />

the region. Almost everywhere communitieg could end did produce virtually elt ttreir aesential<br />

needs from the local environnent, with a minimum of dependence on -trade or exchenge.<br />

Alrnost all types of lend could and did a.rpport some population.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!