08.01.2013 Views

Rt€@lll

Rt€@lll

Rt€@lll

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

'25<br />

In interisland transport similar trends have ceurred. Interislend vessels ere larger md<br />

cell lees often. Tlp amount of cargo to be delivered or uplifted is often too srnall to cover<br />

en route cogts. Higher atandards of safety regulations, desirabb in themaelvea, have led to<br />

the withdrawal of older, srnaller vessels whoae capital cogts hsd been deprecieted. Tle carrea<br />

of the interisland ehipping problems are in fact varied, and often pecific to perticubr<br />

countries. But the upshot is that the smaller and rmre distant islands often have a poorer<br />

service now than 20 or even 80 yesrs ego. Internal passenger air servicer have often<br />

improved - but, by capturing much of t}e inter-island pa$enger traffic, they have made the<br />

viability of sttipping links more problematic. Meenwhile on the larger islsrds road<br />

construction has given increasing proportions of the rural population eesy rcess to towns<br />

and ports for marketing and heve lowered the costs of conEuner gooda, jr.st wtren the<br />

equivalenl coets m outer islands are increesing. Retail pricee of consurEr goods are f5 to 4{l<br />

per cent Ngher in the Lau lclandg than in Suva. The Lauan copra grower hes to produce a<br />

lhird nnre than would a counterpart close to Suva in order to mhieve the sarne real incqne.<br />

Not mly ere the outer islands too srnall to produce srfficient agricultural produce (for export<br />

or urban consunption) to warrant frequent stripping services. Tlcy are too smell to benefit<br />

from bulk wholesele purchasing. And the need to carry large stocks to csrpenrate for<br />

infrequent deliveriea is costly to retailers. lnfrequent servicee also limit the range of<br />

products which can be grown for sale. Copra, being storabb (though st I cct of weight md<br />

incorne loss), remains trre of the few qtiona, but is notorious fon ite price fluctuations.<br />

The need, for political reasons, to maintein some degree of -rvice &spite the lack of<br />

direct economic justification often encourages direct governnEnt participation through use of<br />

a governrnnt fleel. Yet this is often helf-hearted. I would mgue thet it is essential if the<br />

small remote islends are to be sustained as a viabb part of the state, to re-examine the bsig<br />

on which the costs and benefits of sfripping services are evaluated. Foc exarple a study in<br />

Papua New Guinea showed that in the setting of charges for uaero, "the recovery rate for<br />

governrnent road and air lransport costs was considerably bss than 20 per cent wtrile tlre<br />

rate imposed m maritime transport was almost 70 per cent" (Prpctor, 1980: l7)). The hidden<br />

subsidies to road users are r.sually much higher than to strip users. In Fiji, current rural road<br />

cmstruction costs are between fF50r(trO and fF80r000 per kilometre, and mnual nraintenanc-e<br />

costs about fFl'200 per kilometre. An absolutely minimum route stripping rntwork would<br />

cover about 2rfi)0 kms. This length of road would cost the governnent about f2r4 million per<br />

annum to maintainr quite apart from the cost of servicing the capital. In cmrparison the<br />

current budget allocates some f)20rffi0 to stripping subsi-dies. I recognize of courae that<br />

shipping services mly generale traffic at the ports .of call, not along their ufiole bngth s<br />

roads may (but not necessarily) do. Thus the direct comparison between S0.l gtO i2r4 million<br />

is not valid. Neither are the populations served of equal size. But the anti-stripping bias b<br />

clear. Until such time as rnme rrnre equitable means are found for eveluating governnnnt<br />

contributions to shipping vis-a-vis road transport, the small and the renpte ielands wiil<br />

remain as backwaters as far as Lheir agricultural potential is concerned. Perhape the concept<br />

of Inotional' or rstradow' roads has something to offer. Perhaps an index based m road<br />

maintenance cosLs per kilometre might give a measure of reesonable shipping rrbsidy bvele.<br />

Perhaps sttips should be made available to users free of direct capital charges, s roads tend<br />

to be. Certainly some new approach is needed.<br />

Aqricultural directions for the next few decades<br />

Let me sum up by indicating what I believe will be the general trends in agricuhure<br />

over the next 20 years or so, and by noting the particular needs of the atolls for a new<br />

consideration of their agricultural systems. Small size and distance from markets will<br />

continue to make it difficult, if not impossibb, for Pacific Island stetes to influence world<br />

prices for their export produets. Special trade arrangements with Australia or New Zealand,<br />

or lhe EEC through the Lane Agreement will continue to be vital. For many of the outer<br />

islands in the larger countries, coconut based products will continue to be the rtly<br />

exportable agricultural produce. Inproved internal air transport is unlikely to c*range this<br />

situetion significantly. Attention and initiatives for new crops and expansion of existing types<br />

of commercial agriculture will focus increasingly on the larger islands, sr those with an<br />

export port' and m those areas with better soils. The village mixed subsistence-cash crop<br />

system will continue in a state of malaise €rs pressures on the whole society from the<br />

commercial world increase. Governments and farmersr qroups will put increasing emphasis an<br />

providing commercially-oriented menagement in production, provision of inputs and rnarketing.<br />

The type of organization which lhe Asian Development Bank's Sor.lth Pacific Agnicultural<br />

Survey called the "plantation rmde of managementtt (not, I streas, 'rproductionrr, but

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!