14.01.2013 Views

Prospects of Colloidal Nanocrystals for Electronic - Computer Science

Prospects of Colloidal Nanocrystals for Electronic - Computer Science

Prospects of Colloidal Nanocrystals for Electronic - Computer Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

440 Chemical Reviews, 2010, Vol. 110, No. 1 Talapin et al.<br />

Figure 56. The structures <strong>of</strong> floating gate memory devices. (a) Conventional nonvolatile flash memory. (b) Nanocrysal nonvolatile flash<br />

memory. (c) Operation mechanism <strong>of</strong> flash memory: write, shore, and erase conditions. (d) A single discharge path from a weak spot in the<br />

tunneling oxide ruins conventional flash memory, and (e) discharge path in the tunneling oxide <strong>of</strong> nanocrystal nonvolatile flash memory.<br />

target different market niches. For example, DRAM has very<br />

high switching speed and large number <strong>of</strong> write-erase cycles.<br />

At the same time, DRAM is relatively expensive, has to be<br />

refreshed every few milliseconds, and consumes power<br />

during its refresh cycles. HDDs can achieve very high data<br />

density at rather low cost and allow many write-erase cycles,<br />

but are slow to access, consume power to keep the disks<br />

rotating in readiness, and are prone to crashes <strong>of</strong> the head,<br />

which flies just tens <strong>of</strong> nanometers above the disk surface.<br />

The major advantage <strong>of</strong> flash memory is its nonvolatility,<br />

that is, the ability to store in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> a long time without<br />

any power consumption, which, however, comes at the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> low write-erase speed and limited number <strong>of</strong><br />

rewrite cycles.<br />

Memory devices utilizing NCs have been extensively<br />

explored during the past decade as possible solutions to<br />

overcome the scaling issues and improve endurance <strong>of</strong><br />

nonvolatile memory devices 370,571-579 and HDDs. 580,581 Same<br />

as with other application, NCs provide an opportunity to<br />

precisely control electronic and magnetic properties <strong>of</strong><br />

materials by tuning NC size and shape. The possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

device fabrication using colloidal solutions allows significant<br />

cost reductions, especially important <strong>for</strong> the products such<br />

as wireless identification tags and smart cards where the<br />

prime criterion is cost rather than outstanding per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

7.5.1. Flash Memory Devices<br />

The structure <strong>of</strong> conventional flash memory is shown in<br />

Figure 56a. Each memory cell is represented by the metal–<br />

oxide-semiconductor-field-effect-transistor (MOSFET) with<br />

a modified gate stack structure, which has a floating gate<br />

(an island <strong>of</strong> polycrystalline silicon) embedded in the<br />

dielectric layer. The floating gate (FG) is electrically insulated<br />

from the FET channel by a thin (∼2-5 nm) layer <strong>of</strong> a<br />

dielectric material called tunnel oxide. Thermally grown SiO2<br />

is typically used as tunnel oxide; however, high-k dielectric<br />

materials such as HfO2 can provide higher device per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

and are now actively studies <strong>for</strong> this purpose. FG is<br />

also insulated from the FET gate (in flash memory devices<br />

called “control gate”) by a thick layer <strong>of</strong> dielectric called<br />

“control oxide”. When a positive bias is applied to the control<br />

gate, electrons from the channel can tunnel through the layer<br />

<strong>of</strong> tunnel oxide into the FG as shown in Figure 56c. The<br />

writing cycle <strong>of</strong> memory operation is based on the charging<br />

<strong>of</strong> FG. Charge carriers injected into FG remain trapped there<br />

<strong>for</strong> many years, storing a bit <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation. To erase<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation, negative voltage is applied to the control gate,<br />

pushing the electrons to tunnel from FG to the FET channel<br />

and restoring the initial state <strong>of</strong> memory device (Figure 56c).<br />

The charges stored in the FG create an electric field, which<br />

either depletes or accumulates majority carriers in the FET<br />

channel, and the presence <strong>of</strong> charge stored in the FG can be<br />

easily sensed because it is directly proportional to the<br />

threshold voltage <strong>of</strong> the MOSFET.<br />

The voltage applied to the control gate and the writing<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> flash memory device strongly depend on the<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> tunnel oxide. To enable operation at standard<br />

CMOS voltage, the thickness <strong>of</strong> tunnel oxide should not<br />

exceed a few nanometers. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the tunnel oxide<br />

layer also significantly affects the operation (write/erase)<br />

speed, 582 with thin tunnel oxide layers promoting high write/<br />

erase speeds. However, thinner tunnel oxide can also result<br />

in a low breakdown voltage, leakage <strong>of</strong> current through<br />

defects in tunnel oxide layer, and a limited number <strong>of</strong><br />

erase-rewrite cycles. Trap sites such as defects in the gate<br />

oxide can also affect the electron tunnel behavior. 583 The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!