University of Sunderland - Travel Plan Final 200510-1
University of Sunderland - Travel Plan Final 200510-1
University of Sunderland - Travel Plan Final 200510-1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sunderland</strong> <strong>Travel</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Update<br />
Table 3.2 – 2007 and 2009 Modal Split Comparison (Main Mode <strong>of</strong> Transport Transport) – All Staff<br />
Mode <strong>of</strong><br />
Transport<br />
Car Drivers<br />
Car Users<br />
(drivers and<br />
passengers)<br />
Public<br />
Transport<br />
Users<br />
Cycling and<br />
Walking<br />
2007<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents<br />
From 2007 to 2009, there has been a 4.4 percentage point increase in staff car drivers and a 1.8<br />
percentage point increase in staff car users. In addition, public ublic transport usage is down by 22.7<br />
percentage points. However, it is important to note that this is set against background traffic<br />
growth in the Tyne ne & Wear Metropolitan area between 2005 and 2007 <strong>of</strong> 3% for car use and a 3%<br />
decrease in public transport usage. TThere<br />
here has been an increase in cyclists (0.5 percentage points)<br />
and walkers (0.5 percentage points points), ), although these increases are slight and sho should therefore be<br />
treated with a degree <strong>of</strong> caution.<br />
2009 staff taff responses have also been split by campus to highlight any differences between the two<br />
campus locations. As 90% <strong>of</strong> staff work working at the City Campus or St Peter’ ’s Campus, these two<br />
locations have been used as subcategories for this analysis. Results are shown in Table 3.3.<br />
Mode <strong>of</strong> Transport<br />
Car / Van Driver (on<br />
your own)<br />
Car / Van Driver (with<br />
others)<br />
Car / Van (as<br />
passenger)<br />
Motorbike / Scooter<br />
Train<br />
Bus<br />
Campus Bus<br />
Metro<br />
Park and Ride<br />
Cycle<br />
Walk<br />
Taxi<br />
Other<br />
Total<br />
5087709/<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sunderland</strong> - <strong>Travel</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>200510</strong>.docx<br />
61<br />
Table 33.3<br />
– 2009 Modal Split Comparison by Campus – All Staff<br />
City Campus<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents<br />
2007<br />
% <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents<br />
2009<br />
331 55.9% 428<br />
372 62.7% 458<br />
161 26.7% 176<br />
55 9.3% 73<br />
City Campus<br />
% <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> % <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents Respondents<br />
St Peters<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents<br />
St Peters<br />
% <strong>of</strong><br />
Respondents<br />
260 53.9% 86 52.1% 1.8%<br />
33 6.8% 13<br />
17 3.5% 9<br />
3 0.6% 2<br />
8 1.7% 1<br />
54 11.2% 13<br />
0 0% 0<br />
60 12.4% 17 10.3% 2.1%<br />
2 0.4% 0<br />
8 1.7% 10<br />
35 7.3% 14<br />
2 0.4% 0<br />
0 0% 0<br />
482 100% 165 100%<br />
2009<br />
% Point<br />
Variation<br />
2007-09<br />
60.3% 4.4<br />
64.5% 1.8<br />
24% -2.7<br />
10.3% 1<br />
% Point<br />
Variation<br />
between<br />
Campuses<br />
7.9% 1.1%<br />
5.5% 2%<br />
1.2% 0.6%<br />
0.6% 1.1%<br />
7.9% 3.3%<br />
0.0% 0%<br />
0.0% 0.4%<br />
6.1% 4.4%<br />
8.5% 1.2%<br />
0.0% 0.4%<br />
0.0% 0%