19.01.2013 Views

University of Sunderland - Travel Plan Final 200510-1

University of Sunderland - Travel Plan Final 200510-1

University of Sunderland - Travel Plan Final 200510-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sunderland</strong> <strong>Travel</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Update<br />

Table 3.2 – 2007 and 2009 Modal Split Comparison (Main Mode <strong>of</strong> Transport Transport) – All Staff<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong><br />

Transport<br />

Car Drivers<br />

Car Users<br />

(drivers and<br />

passengers)<br />

Public<br />

Transport<br />

Users<br />

Cycling and<br />

Walking<br />

2007<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents<br />

From 2007 to 2009, there has been a 4.4 percentage point increase in staff car drivers and a 1.8<br />

percentage point increase in staff car users. In addition, public ublic transport usage is down by 22.7<br />

percentage points. However, it is important to note that this is set against background traffic<br />

growth in the Tyne ne & Wear Metropolitan area between 2005 and 2007 <strong>of</strong> 3% for car use and a 3%<br />

decrease in public transport usage. TThere<br />

here has been an increase in cyclists (0.5 percentage points)<br />

and walkers (0.5 percentage points points), ), although these increases are slight and sho should therefore be<br />

treated with a degree <strong>of</strong> caution.<br />

2009 staff taff responses have also been split by campus to highlight any differences between the two<br />

campus locations. As 90% <strong>of</strong> staff work working at the City Campus or St Peter’ ’s Campus, these two<br />

locations have been used as subcategories for this analysis. Results are shown in Table 3.3.<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong> Transport<br />

Car / Van Driver (on<br />

your own)<br />

Car / Van Driver (with<br />

others)<br />

Car / Van (as<br />

passenger)<br />

Motorbike / Scooter<br />

Train<br />

Bus<br />

Campus Bus<br />

Metro<br />

Park and Ride<br />

Cycle<br />

Walk<br />

Taxi<br />

Other<br />

Total<br />

5087709/<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sunderland</strong> - <strong>Travel</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>200510</strong>.docx<br />

61<br />

Table 33.3<br />

– 2009 Modal Split Comparison by Campus – All Staff<br />

City Campus<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents<br />

2007<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents<br />

2009<br />

331 55.9% 428<br />

372 62.7% 458<br />

161 26.7% 176<br />

55 9.3% 73<br />

City Campus<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> % <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents Respondents<br />

St Peters<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents<br />

St Peters<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Respondents<br />

260 53.9% 86 52.1% 1.8%<br />

33 6.8% 13<br />

17 3.5% 9<br />

3 0.6% 2<br />

8 1.7% 1<br />

54 11.2% 13<br />

0 0% 0<br />

60 12.4% 17 10.3% 2.1%<br />

2 0.4% 0<br />

8 1.7% 10<br />

35 7.3% 14<br />

2 0.4% 0<br />

0 0% 0<br />

482 100% 165 100%<br />

2009<br />

% Point<br />

Variation<br />

2007-09<br />

60.3% 4.4<br />

64.5% 1.8<br />

24% -2.7<br />

10.3% 1<br />

% Point<br />

Variation<br />

between<br />

Campuses<br />

7.9% 1.1%<br />

5.5% 2%<br />

1.2% 0.6%<br />

0.6% 1.1%<br />

7.9% 3.3%<br />

0.0% 0%<br />

0.0% 0.4%<br />

6.1% 4.4%<br />

8.5% 1.2%<br />

0.0% 0.4%<br />

0.0% 0%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!