24.01.2013 Views

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Influence <strong>of</strong> thermal noise on measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical bonds in UHV-AFM<br />

Peter M. H<strong>of</strong>fmann<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Physics and Astronomy, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201<br />

P.I-07<br />

Ultra-high vacuum based AFM has been repeatedly shown to provide high resolution<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> forces and force gradients associated with chemical bonds 1-5 . However,<br />

the bond parameters, such as bond length and energies, have varied between<br />

measurements. One theory put forward for these discrepancies has been the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

thermal noise on measurements performed at room temperature. In FM-AFM it was<br />

originally found that bond force curves seem broadened when measured at room<br />

temperature 1 , and theoretically expected bond lengths were only recovered when<br />

measurements were obtained at low temperature 2 . On the other hand, AM-AFM<br />

performed at small amplitudes found no such broadening at room temperature 3 . More<br />

recent measurements using FM AFM at room temperature, however, also seem to show<br />

shorter interaction lengths 4,5 . What, if any, is the influence <strong>of</strong> cantilever thermal noise on<br />

measured interaction lengths? We present a simulation study <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> thermal<br />

noise on measurements <strong>of</strong> interaction forces using FM or AM AFM.<br />

[1] M. Guggisberg, et al., Phys. Rev. B 61, 11151 (2000).<br />

[2] M. A. Lantz, et al., Science 291, 2580 (2001).<br />

[3] P.M. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, et al.. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. 457, 1161-1174 (2001).<br />

[4] Y. Sugimoto et al., Phys. Rev. B 77, 195424 (2008).<br />

[5] K. Ruschmeier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156102 (2008)<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!