Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
M. Teresa Cuberes<br />
Ultrasonic Nanolithography on Hard Substrates<br />
Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Nanotechnology, University <strong>of</strong> Castilla-La Mancha, Almadén, Spain.<br />
P.I-34<br />
Ultrasonic- AFM techniques provide a means to monitor ultrasonic vibration at the<br />
nanoscale and open up novel opportunities to improve nan<strong>of</strong>abrication technologies [1].<br />
Ultrasonic <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Microscopy</strong> (UFM) relies on the mechanical-diode cantilever response<br />
when ultrasonic vibration is excited at the tip-sample contact [2]. Strictly, UFM is a<br />
dynamic AFM (<strong>Atomic</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Microscopy</strong>) implementation in which the tip-sample<br />
contact is periodically broken at ultrasonic frequencies. In the presence <strong>of</strong> ultrasonic<br />
vibration, the tip <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>of</strong>t cantilever can dynamically indent hard samples due to its<br />
inertia. Fig. 1 (a) demonstrates scratching <strong>of</strong> a silicon sample in the presence <strong>of</strong> ultrasonic<br />
vibration, using a cantilever with nominal stiffness <strong>of</strong> 0.11 Nm -1 and a SiN tip. In the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> ultrasound, it was not possible to scratch the Si surface using such a s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
cantilever. Interestingly, no debris is found in the proximity <strong>of</strong> lithographed areas.<br />
Fig. 1 (b) displays ultrasonic curves -UFM response for increasing ultrasonic<br />
excitation amplitude- recorded during UFM imaging (curve (a)) and during scratching <strong>of</strong><br />
silicon (curves c-d). UFM imaging is carried out without substrate modification by using<br />
a lower tip-sample load. When increasing the load, the silicon substrate is scratched<br />
provided a sufficiently high ultrasonic amplitude is excited. By monitoring the ultrasonicinduced<br />
cantilever responses during manipulation, information about the substrate<br />
modification can be obtained. As the substrate is being scratched, the UFM responses<br />
change. Apparently, for a fixed load, a critical ultrasonic amplitude is needed to induce<br />
modification (see Fig 1 (b)). In the poster, the advantages <strong>of</strong> ultrasonic nanolithography,<br />
and the shape <strong>of</strong> UFM curves recorded during manipulation will be discussed in detail.<br />
a) b)<br />
Figure 1. AFM scratching <strong>of</strong> Si(111) in the presence <strong>of</strong> normal surface ultrasonic vibration <strong>of</strong> ~<br />
5 MHz using a pyramidal SiN cantilever tip with nominal stiffness 0.11 Nm -1 (a) Nanotrenches<br />
formed in 50, 70 and 100 cycles respectively, at a load <strong>of</strong> ~ 40 nN and maximum ultrasonic<br />
amplitude Am = 500 mV (b) UFM response for a triangular modulation <strong>of</strong> the ultrasonic<br />
excitation (see lowest curve). Load: (i) ~ 26 nN. (ii-iv) ~ 40 nN. Am=500 mV.<br />
[1] M. T. Cuberes, J. <strong>of</strong> Phys.: Conf. Ser. 61 (2007) 219.<br />
[2] M. T. Cuberes in “Applied Scanning Probe Methods”, B. Bhushan and H. Fuchs (ed.), Springer 2009.<br />
125