Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Fr-0940<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> the Optimum Spring Constant and Oscillation<br />
Amplitude for <strong>Atomic</strong>/Molecular-Resolution FM-AFM<br />
Yoshihiro Hosokawa 1 , Kei Kobayashi 2 , Hir<strong>of</strong>umi Yamada 1 and Kazumi Matsushige 1<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Electronic Science and <strong>Engineering</strong>, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan<br />
2 Innovative Collaboration Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.<br />
Several studies have shown that the lateral resolution <strong>of</strong> FM-AFM on Si(111)-7x7 surface<br />
can be improved by oscillating a force sensor with a very high spring constant (> 1,000<br />
N/m) at a very small amplitude (< 1 nm) [1,2]. However, the resolution <strong>of</strong> FM-AFM on<br />
an organic thin film was not improved by the use <strong>of</strong> a cantilever with a spring constant <strong>of</strong><br />
about 700 N/m [3]. Here we propose a general procedure to determine the optimum<br />
imaging parameters (spring constant and oscillation amplitude) for obtaining atomic or<br />
molecular resolution by FM-AFM.<br />
We first determine the minimum distance between the tip and the sample, which is<br />
limited by the instability caused by jump-into-contact the sample or by the dissipative tipsample<br />
interaction forces. Then we defined effective signal intensity for atom/molecularresolution<br />
FM-AFM as the difference between the frequency shift on top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
atom/molecule and on the gap between the atoms/molecules at the minimum distance.<br />
Figure 1 shows a plot <strong>of</strong> the calculated signal-to-noise ratio on lead-phthalocyanine thin<br />
films on MoS2. The optimum spring constant and oscillation amplitude were 10 N/m and<br />
25 nm, respectively. Figure 2(a) is a preliminary experimental result using 7.4 N/m<br />
cantilever. Line pr<strong>of</strong>iles obtained from Fig. 2(a) (red, bold) and from the image (black,<br />
thin) using 40 N/m cantilever [3] are shown in Fig. 2(b). From Fig.2(b), the corrugation<br />
was larger and consequently signal-to-noise ratio was improved when we used a<br />
cantilever with a smaller spring constant and a larger oscillation amplitude.<br />
Figure 1: Signal-to-noise ratio for<br />
molecular-resolution FM-AFM on PbPc with<br />
various spring constant and oscillation<br />
amplitude. The optimum spring constant and<br />
oscillation amplitude is 10 N/m and 25 nm.<br />
[1] F. J. Giessibl et al., Appl. Surf. Sci., 140 (199) 352.<br />
[2] S. Kawai et al., Appl. Phys. Let., 86 (2005) 193107.<br />
[3] Y. Hosokawa et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 47(2008) 6125.<br />
84<br />
Figure 2: (a) Topographic<br />
image <strong>of</strong> PbPc<br />
obtained with using small spring constant<br />
cantilever (7.4 N/m) at large amplitude (15<br />
nm). (b) Line pr<strong>of</strong>iles obtained from (a)<br />
(red, bold) and from the image obtained<br />
using 40 N/m cantilever