24.01.2013 Views

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fr-0940<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> the Optimum Spring Constant and Oscillation<br />

Amplitude for <strong>Atomic</strong>/Molecular-Resolution FM-AFM<br />

Yoshihiro Hosokawa 1 , Kei Kobayashi 2 , Hir<strong>of</strong>umi Yamada 1 and Kazumi Matsushige 1<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Electronic Science and <strong>Engineering</strong>, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan<br />

2 Innovative Collaboration Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.<br />

Several studies have shown that the lateral resolution <strong>of</strong> FM-AFM on Si(111)-7x7 surface<br />

can be improved by oscillating a force sensor with a very high spring constant (> 1,000<br />

N/m) at a very small amplitude (< 1 nm) [1,2]. However, the resolution <strong>of</strong> FM-AFM on<br />

an organic thin film was not improved by the use <strong>of</strong> a cantilever with a spring constant <strong>of</strong><br />

about 700 N/m [3]. Here we propose a general procedure to determine the optimum<br />

imaging parameters (spring constant and oscillation amplitude) for obtaining atomic or<br />

molecular resolution by FM-AFM.<br />

We first determine the minimum distance between the tip and the sample, which is<br />

limited by the instability caused by jump-into-contact the sample or by the dissipative tipsample<br />

interaction forces. Then we defined effective signal intensity for atom/molecularresolution<br />

FM-AFM as the difference between the frequency shift on top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

atom/molecule and on the gap between the atoms/molecules at the minimum distance.<br />

Figure 1 shows a plot <strong>of</strong> the calculated signal-to-noise ratio on lead-phthalocyanine thin<br />

films on MoS2. The optimum spring constant and oscillation amplitude were 10 N/m and<br />

25 nm, respectively. Figure 2(a) is a preliminary experimental result using 7.4 N/m<br />

cantilever. Line pr<strong>of</strong>iles obtained from Fig. 2(a) (red, bold) and from the image (black,<br />

thin) using 40 N/m cantilever [3] are shown in Fig. 2(b). From Fig.2(b), the corrugation<br />

was larger and consequently signal-to-noise ratio was improved when we used a<br />

cantilever with a smaller spring constant and a larger oscillation amplitude.<br />

Figure 1: Signal-to-noise ratio for<br />

molecular-resolution FM-AFM on PbPc with<br />

various spring constant and oscillation<br />

amplitude. The optimum spring constant and<br />

oscillation amplitude is 10 N/m and 25 nm.<br />

[1] F. J. Giessibl et al., Appl. Surf. Sci., 140 (199) 352.<br />

[2] S. Kawai et al., Appl. Phys. Let., 86 (2005) 193107.<br />

[3] Y. Hosokawa et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 47(2008) 6125.<br />

84<br />

Figure 2: (a) Topographic<br />

image <strong>of</strong> PbPc<br />

obtained with using small spring constant<br />

cantilever (7.4 N/m) at large amplitude (15<br />

nm). (b) Line pr<strong>of</strong>iles obtained from (a)<br />

(red, bold) and from the image obtained<br />

using 40 N/m cantilever

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!