Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P.II-25<br />
Contrast formation on cross-linked (1x2) reconstructed titania (110)<br />
Hans H. Pieper 1 , Stefan Torbrügge 1,2 , Stephan Bahr 1,2 , Krithika Venkataramani 1,3 ,<br />
Angelika Kühnle 1 and Michael Reichling 1<br />
1 Fachbereich Physik, Universität Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 7, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany<br />
2 present address: SPECS GmbH, Voltastrasse 5, 13355 Berlin, Germnay<br />
3 present address: iNano, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark<br />
In NC-AFM imaging, the tip structure plays a prominent role in atomic contrast<br />
formation. It is, for instance, possible to image the cationic or the anionic sub-lattice <strong>of</strong><br />
CaF2(111) by changing the tip termination [1]. For the unreconstructed rutile TiO2 (110)<br />
at least a third mode is known [2].<br />
Here, we investigate the cross-linked (1x2) surface reconstruction <strong>of</strong> rutile<br />
TiO2(110), which has been studied both with STM and NC-AFM, however, the atomic<br />
structure is still discussed controversially. We present NC-AFM results, which will be<br />
interpreted with respect to tip termination and tip-surface distance. A comparison with<br />
existing models provides strong evidence for one <strong>of</strong> these models.<br />
Figure 1: Three consecutive images <strong>of</strong> the cross-linked (1x2) titania surface taken with different<br />
tip terminations. The left image is taken with a positive tip termination. A contact with the sample<br />
leads to a negative tip termination (middle image). The tip in the right picture is unidentified.<br />
Figure 2: High resolution measurements are in good agreement with the surface model suggested<br />
by Bennett [3] as shown to the right.<br />
[1] C. Barth et al. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 2061 (2001)<br />
[2] G.H. Enevoldsen et al. Phys. Rev. B 76, 205415 (2007)<br />
[3] R.A. Bennett et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3831 (1999)<br />
153