24.01.2013 Views

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P.I-33<br />

Experimental Study <strong>of</strong> Dissipation Mechanisms in AFM Cantilevers<br />

Fredy Zypman<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Physics, Yeshiva University, New York, USA.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> energy dissipation in an oscillating AFM cantilever is a fact that must be<br />

included in any force reconstruction algorithm. Although commonly low quality factor<br />

(Q) cantilevers get on the way <strong>of</strong> high accuracy non-contact measurements, some times<br />

they can be used purposely. A case in point is the study <strong>of</strong> the measurement <strong>of</strong> fluids<br />

viscosity by monitoring changes in Q [1]. In this work we study theoretically the<br />

mechanisms <strong>of</strong> energy dissipation in AFM, and validate the corresponding models<br />

experimentally. This understanding <strong>of</strong> the origins <strong>of</strong> energy dissipation is not only<br />

interesting for its own sake, but it is also relevant with an eye on practical applications.<br />

We have done extensive work on cantilevers <strong>of</strong> various shapes but, to fix ideas we<br />

consider a rectangular cantilever in this abstract. In that case, the beam model is<br />

commonly used to obtain the corresponding frequency spectrum via the steady state<br />

4<br />

2<br />

EI ∂ u(<br />

x,<br />

t)<br />

∂ u(<br />

x,<br />

t)<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> + = 0 , where u( x,<br />

t)<br />

is the deflection <strong>of</strong> the cantilever<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Aρ<br />

∂x<br />

∂t<br />

at location x and time t , E is the Young's modulus, I the cross sectional moment <strong>of</strong><br />

inertia, A the cross sectional area, and ρ the mass density. In the beam model, a<br />

∂u dissipation term proportional to is usually introduced. The proportionality factor is a<br />

∂t<br />

difficult problem in itself that involves the interaction <strong>of</strong> the cantilever with the<br />

surrounding fluid [2]. The complete equation describes quite well the central frequency<br />

and width <strong>of</strong> multiple peaks. However, a detailed analysis shows that the peak shape is<br />

not in full agreement with experiment if fine details are included. We will show that this<br />

is improved by introducing explicit dissipation terms based on basic physical principles<br />

that represent cantilever-fluid interaction and internal viscoelasticity. The model is<br />

solved and compared with experimental data obtained on a Veeco AFM. We will also<br />

argue that this improvement is necessary to produce reconstruction algorithms consistent<br />

with the resolutions necessary today to measure objects at the subnanometer scale, like<br />

charges in biological molecules.<br />

[1] A. Schilowitz, D. Yablon, E. Lansey, and F. Zypman, Measurement 41, 1169 (2008).<br />

[2] J.E. Sader, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 64 (1998)<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!