Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy - Yale School of Engineering ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
P.I-33<br />
Experimental Study <strong>of</strong> Dissipation Mechanisms in AFM Cantilevers<br />
Fredy Zypman<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Physics, Yeshiva University, New York, USA.<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> energy dissipation in an oscillating AFM cantilever is a fact that must be<br />
included in any force reconstruction algorithm. Although commonly low quality factor<br />
(Q) cantilevers get on the way <strong>of</strong> high accuracy non-contact measurements, some times<br />
they can be used purposely. A case in point is the study <strong>of</strong> the measurement <strong>of</strong> fluids<br />
viscosity by monitoring changes in Q [1]. In this work we study theoretically the<br />
mechanisms <strong>of</strong> energy dissipation in AFM, and validate the corresponding models<br />
experimentally. This understanding <strong>of</strong> the origins <strong>of</strong> energy dissipation is not only<br />
interesting for its own sake, but it is also relevant with an eye on practical applications.<br />
We have done extensive work on cantilevers <strong>of</strong> various shapes but, to fix ideas we<br />
consider a rectangular cantilever in this abstract. In that case, the beam model is<br />
commonly used to obtain the corresponding frequency spectrum via the steady state<br />
4<br />
2<br />
EI ∂ u(<br />
x,<br />
t)<br />
∂ u(<br />
x,<br />
t)<br />
solution <strong>of</strong> + = 0 , where u( x,<br />
t)<br />
is the deflection <strong>of</strong> the cantilever<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Aρ<br />
∂x<br />
∂t<br />
at location x and time t , E is the Young's modulus, I the cross sectional moment <strong>of</strong><br />
inertia, A the cross sectional area, and ρ the mass density. In the beam model, a<br />
∂u dissipation term proportional to is usually introduced. The proportionality factor is a<br />
∂t<br />
difficult problem in itself that involves the interaction <strong>of</strong> the cantilever with the<br />
surrounding fluid [2]. The complete equation describes quite well the central frequency<br />
and width <strong>of</strong> multiple peaks. However, a detailed analysis shows that the peak shape is<br />
not in full agreement with experiment if fine details are included. We will show that this<br />
is improved by introducing explicit dissipation terms based on basic physical principles<br />
that represent cantilever-fluid interaction and internal viscoelasticity. The model is<br />
solved and compared with experimental data obtained on a Veeco AFM. We will also<br />
argue that this improvement is necessary to produce reconstruction algorithms consistent<br />
with the resolutions necessary today to measure objects at the subnanometer scale, like<br />
charges in biological molecules.<br />
[1] A. Schilowitz, D. Yablon, E. Lansey, and F. Zypman, Measurement 41, 1169 (2008).<br />
[2] J.E. Sader, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 64 (1998)<br />
124