25.01.2013 Views

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.7 The Role of MHC Class II Processing <strong>and</strong> Presentation in Tumors<br />

result in increases of MHC class Isurface expression in regions distant from the inflammatory<br />

site.<br />

However, some tumors are resistant to IFN-g treatment. This can be due either to<br />

mutations in the IFN-g receptor (R) or to deficiencies in components of the IFN-g<br />

signal transduction pathway, e. g. the IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs [91, 92]; for<br />

further information, see Chapter 8). In addition to the IFNs, TNF-a has also been<br />

shown to affect the MHC class Iantigen processing <strong>and</strong> presentation <strong>by</strong> coordinately<br />

modulating the expression of components of the MHC class Ipathway. Thus, TNF-a<br />

may be useful when a concerted up-regulation of the MHC class IAPM is required,<br />

but cannot be achieved <strong>by</strong> IFN-g [93].<br />

5.7<br />

The Role of MHC Class II Processing <strong>and</strong> Presentation in Tumors<br />

The normal expression pattern of MHC class II genes is restricted to professional<br />

APCs, thymic epithelium <strong>and</strong> B cells. MHC class II induction can occur on most cell<br />

types through the exposure to various cytokines, in particular to IFN-g [3]. The expression<br />

of MHC class II antigens on cells other than APCs can aid in the initiation<br />

<strong>and</strong> maintenance of an acute immune response.<br />

Most human tumors do not express MHC class II molecules <strong>and</strong> the direct presentation<br />

pathway for activation of CD4 + T cells is therefore not available. In general,<br />

CD4 + T cell activation for these tumors depends exclusively on the indirect presentation<br />

via professional APCs. Limited CD4 + T cell responses to such tumors may reflect<br />

the inefficiency of cross-priming. Immunization experiments using MHC class<br />

II-expressing tumor cells demonstrated that tumor cells are the predominant APCs<br />

in vivo for priming naÒve CD4 + T cells. Thus, their inclusion into cancer vaccines<br />

may enhance activation of tumor-reactive CD4 + T cells [94].<br />

5.7.1<br />

Frequency <strong>and</strong> Clinical Impact of MHC Class II Expression on Tumors<br />

There is considerable evidence that the aberrant expression of MHC class II antigens<br />

<strong>and</strong> of the components involved in MHC class II antigen processing has pathophysiological<br />

consequences in malignant diseases. The constitutive or regulated expression<br />

of these proteins in tumors influences their immunity. The frequency of constitutive<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or IFN-g-induced MHC class II expression varies between the different<br />

tumor types analyzed, but is usually associated with the co-expression of Ii <strong>and</strong> HLA-<br />

DM. One could distinguish three MHC class II phenotypes in human tumors: noninducible,<br />

inducible <strong>and</strong> constitutive [95] (Fig. 5.17). It is generally assumed that the<br />

IFN-g-inducible phenotype is normal, whereas the non-induced <strong>and</strong> constitutive<br />

MHC class II phenotypes are a result of neoplastic transformation.<br />

The non-inducible MHC class II phenotype may represent a mutant cell line missing<br />

the required factors involved in the IFN-g-mediated induction. Thus, it is questioned<br />

whether the tumor habors a mutation that prevents MHC class II inducibility,<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!