25.01.2013 Views

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16.3Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma<br />

Effective vaccination was demonstrated in a prophylactic setting when immunization<br />

with the pW-CEA vaccine, followed <strong>by</strong> a lethal challenge with LLC-CEA-KSA<br />

cells, reduced s.c. tumor growth to about 25% of that observed in control animals injected<br />

only with PBS. Control vaccinations with attenuated S. typhimurium carrying<br />

only the control expression vector pER-CEA which was anchored in the ER did not<br />

inhibit s.c. tumor growth [43]. These findings have several implications. First, attenuated<br />

S. typhimurium per se failed to induce tumor-protective immunity in our animal<br />

model. Second, using this carrier with the pW-CEA vaccine accomplished targeting<br />

to secondary lymphoid tissue since this attenuated strain of S. typhimurium was<br />

reported previously to serve as a useful oral carrier which effectively transported<br />

DNA through the gastrointestinal tract <strong>and</strong> then through the M cells into the Peyer's<br />

patches of the small intestine [44±46]. From there, the attenuated bacteria enter<br />

APCs such as macrophages <strong>and</strong> DCs, where they die because of their mutation rendering<br />

then unable to synthesize aromatic amino acids, there<strong>by</strong> liberating multiple<br />

copies of DNA inside the phagocytes. Third, aside from providing a ªdanger signalº<br />

that stimulates the innate immune system <strong>by</strong> producing IL-12 <strong>and</strong> NO [44±46], the<br />

attenuated bacteria carrier provided for an intralymphatic vaccination with naked<br />

DNA [47±49] which was recently reported to be far more effective than either intramuscular,<br />

intradermal, s.c. or intrasplenical routes of vaccination [50]. Importantly,<br />

the pER-CEA vaccine provided an important negative control because it lacked both<br />

the endogenous leader <strong>and</strong> C-terminal anchor sequences, while also containing an<br />

ER targeting <strong>and</strong> an ER-retention signal, SEKDEL, thus causing its complete retention<br />

in the ER. Thus, this truncated molecule could not enter the cytoplasm to be<br />

processed in the proteasome. Consequently this prevented suitable peptide epitopes<br />

from combining with MHC class I molecules for transport to the cell surface. However,<br />

this very same sequence of antigen processing <strong>and</strong> presentation worked very<br />

well indeed in our tumor model as indicated <strong>by</strong> the effective protective immunity induced<br />

<strong>by</strong> the pW-CEA vaccine encoding the intact CEA gene that ultimately achieved<br />

expression of CEA epitopes on the cell surface [43].<br />

Significantly, our results indicated that the pW-CEA vaccine elicited an effective<br />

MHC class I antigen-restricted <strong>and</strong> T cell-mediated, tumor-protective immune response.<br />

This resulted in a 75% reduction of s.c. tumor growth <strong>and</strong> completely prevented<br />

the dissemination of experimental pulmonary metastases in two of eight<br />

CEA-transgenic mice. Importantly, however, i.v. boosts with non-curative doses of<br />

huKS1/4±IL-2 immunocytokine (5 × 5 mg) completely eradicated s.c. tumor growth<br />

in 100% of experimental animals <strong>and</strong> prevented dissemination of pulmonary metastases<br />

in 75% of these mice. In contrast, in a control experiment, an equal dose of the<br />

huKS1/4±IL-2 immunocytokine used to boost the control vaccine pER-CEA proved<br />

ineffective. The results of our experiment preventing experimental pulmonary metastases<br />

of Lewis lung carcinoma are depicted in Fig. 16.3.<br />

Significantly, our results suggested some of the immunological mechanisms responsible<br />

for the effective vaccination with the pW-CEA vaccine. Thus, marked activation<br />

of both T cells <strong>and</strong> DCs was indicated <strong>by</strong> a decisive up-regulation in expression of<br />

the T cell integrin LFA-2 (CD2) on CD8 + T cells <strong>and</strong> the CD48 adhesion molecule on<br />

DCs. These two molecules are known to synergize in the binding of T lymphocytes<br />

325

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!