25.01.2013 Views

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

Cancer Immune Therapy Edited by G. Stuhler and P. Walden ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15.3<br />

Graft-versus-Tumor (GvT)Effect<br />

Barnes in 1956 first suggested the existence of a GvT effect in experimental models,<br />

which Math termed ªadoptive immunotherapyº in 1965 [7]. L<strong>and</strong>mark articles describing<br />

graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effects in human marrow allograft recipients<br />

were published <strong>by</strong> Weiden in 1979 <strong>and</strong> 1981 [8]. In these studies, the Seattle group<br />

reported that leukemia relapse rates following allogeneic BMT were markedly less in<br />

patients who developed GvHD as compared with those who did not. Horowitz studies<br />

on relapse rates following allogeneic <strong>and</strong> syngeneic BMT, showed that relapse<br />

rates are lower in patients who develop both acute <strong>and</strong> chronic GvHD, higher in<br />

those who develop no clinically evident GvHD, <strong>and</strong> higher still if T cells are depleted<br />

from the marrow graft or in recipients of twin transplants [9]. These observations led<br />

to the hypothesis that the GvT response is mediated <strong>by</strong> immunologically competent<br />

donor cells <strong>and</strong> that these cells could be used therapeutically to induce a direct GvT<br />

reaction. The strongest evidence of GvT came from the observation that many patients<br />

who relapse after allogeneic BMT can be reinduced into long-term remission<br />

<strong>by</strong> simply infusing additional donor lymphocytes [10]. Table 15.4 summarizes the<br />

evidence supporting an allogeneic GvL effect.<br />

15.4<br />

Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLIs)<br />

Since the first report of Kolb in 1990, DLIs have been widely used as treatment of<br />

disease recurrence after allogeneic BMT [11±14]. From these large series of DLIs,<br />

major differences emerged among malignancies in their susceptibility to GvL effects.<br />

Table 15.5 shows results from the European Blood <strong>and</strong> Marrow Transplantation<br />

Group (EBMT) DLI study. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is the most sensitive<br />

leukemia, with a probability of complete cytogenetic remission after DLI of 80 %<br />

with an overall survival at 5 years of 80%, in patients with cytogenetic relapse; in the<br />

case of disease recurring in transformed phase, the response rate to DLI <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

probability of survival are 36 <strong>and</strong> 25%, respectively. In the study reported <strong>by</strong> Collins<br />

et al. [13], the response rate <strong>and</strong> actuarial probability of long-term complete remissions<br />

(CRs) are comparable to the EBMT study. Remissions have been reported in<br />

patients who relapse soon after undergoing transplantation because of discontinuation<br />

of immunosuppressive therapy without DLI; the discontinuation of immuno-<br />

Tab. 15.4 Evidence supporting an allogeneic GvLeffect<br />

15.4 Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLIs)<br />

Demonstration of minimal residual disease present early after high-dose therapy<br />

Reduced risk of relapse in patients with acute <strong>and</strong> chronic GvHD<br />

Increased risk of relapse after syngeneic <strong>and</strong> T cell-depleted transplants<br />

Induction of remission <strong>by</strong> DLIs in patients relapsing post-BMT<br />

Demonstration of reactivity of donor-derived T cell clones against malignant cells<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!