25.06.2013 Views

Sudáfrica 2010 - FIFA.com

Sudáfrica 2010 - FIFA.com

Sudáfrica 2010 - FIFA.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

teams from the day of their arrival. Dr Astrid Junge, Head<br />

of Research at F-MARC, analysed the data submitted daily<br />

by the team physicians. Thanks to intense <strong>com</strong>munication<br />

with the team physicians, a response rate of 96% was<br />

achieved. Overall, the results demonstrated the success of<br />

<strong>FIFA</strong>’s and F-MARC’s preventive efforts: the overall injury<br />

rate of 1.9 injuries per match was the lowest observed<br />

at a men’s World Cup since 1998, when injury recording<br />

started.<br />

The vast majority of injuries were of minor to moderate<br />

severity, with no-time-loss injuries accounting for 31%,<br />

and almost half of the injuries (46%) causing an absence<br />

from play of only 1-3 days. This means that not only the<br />

frequency, but also the severity of injuries was considerably<br />

lower than in previous years (see fi gure 2). Severe injuries<br />

with time loss of more than four weeks have been<br />

remarkably reduced.<br />

Another important and positive observation was made<br />

with regard to the causes of injuries. Foul play as a cause<br />

of injury was reduced by more than half as <strong>com</strong>pared to<br />

the previous two World Cups, while non-contact injuries<br />

increased. There are several possible explanations for this<br />

observation, including a generally higher appreciation of fair<br />

play by players, stricter implementation of the Laws of the<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

2.4<br />

1998<br />

2.7<br />

2002<br />

1.7<br />

2.3<br />

2006<br />

1.5<br />

1.9<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Fig. 1 Injuries at the <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup from 1998 to <strong>2010</strong> (red = total injuries<br />

per match; orange = injuries with absence from training or matches)<br />

1.3<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup South Africa<br />

Game, changes in playing style and better preparation for<br />

the <strong>com</strong>petition.<br />

137<br />

Out-of-<strong>com</strong>petition doping control<br />

All teams participating in the <strong>2010</strong> <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup had to<br />

submit their whereabouts for the two months prior to the<br />

start of the <strong>com</strong>petition and were subject to no-advancenotice<br />

controls at their respective location during this<br />

period. Following <strong>FIFA</strong>’s plan for out-of-<strong>com</strong>petition controls<br />

within the pre-<strong>com</strong>petition testing pool <strong>2010</strong>, eight players<br />

were drawn by lots and had to provide urine and/or<br />

blood samples. All of the 256 samples tested negative for<br />

prohibited substances.<br />

In-<strong>com</strong>petition doping control<br />

Following the routine in-<strong>com</strong>petition procedure as<br />

described in the <strong>FIFA</strong> Anti-Doping Regulations <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

two players per team were randomly selected for doping<br />

control after each of the 64 matches to provide urine<br />

and/or blood samples. Altogether, 256 samples were<br />

collected and analysed at the WADA-accredited laboratory<br />

2002 2006 <strong>2010</strong><br />

No absence 33% 30% 31%<br />

1-3 days 37% 33% 46%<br />

4-7 days 17% 15% 8%<br />

8-28 days 11% 18% 3%<br />

> 28 days 2% 5% 1%<br />

Fig. 2 Injury severity at the <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup from 2002 to <strong>2010</strong><br />

2002 2006 <strong>2010</strong><br />

No contact 27% 27% 37%<br />

Contact, no foul 37% 33% 46%<br />

Foul play 17% 15% 8%<br />

Fig. 3 Injury mechanisms at the <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup between 2002 and <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!