13.07.2015 Views

PT BERAU COAL AND SUBSIDIARY - Bakrie & Brothers

PT BERAU COAL AND SUBSIDIARY - Bakrie & Brothers

PT BERAU COAL AND SUBSIDIARY - Bakrie & Brothers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PT</strong> BAKRIE & BROTHERS TbkDAN ANAK PERUSAHAANCATATAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGANKONSOLIDASIANUNTUK PERIODE ENAM BULAN YANG BERAKHIRPADA TANGGAL 30 JUNI 2010 (TIDAK DIAUDIT)(Dengan Angka Perbandingan untuk Periode EnamBulan yang Berakhir pada Tanggal 30 Juni 2009)(Disajikan dalam Ribuan Rupiah, kecuali dinyatakanlain)<strong>PT</strong> BAKRIE & BROTHERS Tbk<strong>AND</strong> SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTSFOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDEDJUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)(With Comparative Figures for the Six-MonthPeriod Ended June 30, 2009)(Expressed in Thousands Rupiah, unlessotherwise stated)41. KEWAJIBAN BERSYARAT (Lanjutan) 41. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)Selanjutnya BSP diminta melepas tanah arealHGU BSP seluas 1.408 hektar secarabertahap yang akan digunakan untuk arahanperibadatan, perumahan non-urban, pasar,perdagangan, pendidikan, dan lain-lain sesuaidengan Surat Bupati Kepala Daerah Tingkat IIAsahan No. 620/4157 tanggal 21 September1999. Sampai dengan tahun 2005, tanah yangtelah dialokasikan adalah seluas kurang lebih44 hektar. Proyeksi potensi kerugian ataspelepasan tanah seluas 1.364 hektar terdiridari:- Perkebunan karet: 873 hektar yangberlokasi di Tanah Raja dan Serbangandengan potensi kerugian produksi danpemberian pesangon karyawan masingmasingkurang lebih adalah sebesar 4.768ton dan Rp3 milyar atas 182 karyawan;- Perkebunan kelapa sawit: 491 hektaryang berlokasi di Tanah Raja denganpotensi kerugian produksi dan pemberianpesangon karyawan masing-masing adalahsebesar 228.777 ton dan Rp868 juta atas58 karyawan.c. Pada tanggal 6 Desember 2005, <strong>PT</strong> ShamrockManufacturing Corpora (“Shamrock”)mengajukan gugatan kepada PengadilanNegeri Jakarta Selatan terhadap Plantations &General Investment PLC, sebagai tergugatkesatu (“PGI”), Bengkulu Rubber Company,sebagai tergugat kedua (“BRC”), The AngloIndonesia Corporation, sebagai tergugat ketiga(“AIC”), Rabobank International, sebagaitergugat keempat dan <strong>PT</strong> Air Muring (AM),Anak perusahaan, sebagai tergugat kelimasehubungan dengan klaim yang didalilkan olehShamrock, yang timbul atas satu daripelanggan Shamrock dimana Shamrockdiharuskan membayar penalti sebesarUS$28,43 juta.Menurut dalil yang disampaikan oleh Shamrockdalam gugatannya, penalti dikenakan kepadaShamrock sehubungan dengan kegagalanmengirimkan pesanan. Berdasarkan pendapatShamrock, kegagalan tersebut disebabkankarena pembatalan penjualan saham AM yangdimiliki oleh PGI, BRC dan AIC kepadaShamrock.Furthermore, BSP should relinquish the landright of 1,408 hectares gradually to bedeveloped as places of worship, non-urbanresidences, traditional markets, tradecenters, schools, etc. based on LocalGovernment of Asahan Letter No. 620/4157dated September 21, 1999. Until 2005, theland allocated is 44 hectares. Projection ofpotential loss on relinquishing land rights of1,364 hectares consists of:- Rubber plantation: 873 hectares locatedin Tanah Raja and Serbangan withpotential loss of production and severancepay being about 4,768 tons and Rp3billion for 182 employees, respectively;- Oil palm plantation: 491 hectares locatedin Tanah Raja with potential loss ofproduction and severance pay beingabout 228,777 tons and Rp868 million for58 employees, respectively.c. On December 6, 2005, <strong>PT</strong> ShamrockManufacturing Corpora (“Shamrock”) filed anappeal at the District Court of South Jakartaagainst Plantations & General InvestmentPLC, as the first defendant (“PGI”), BengkuluRubber Company, as the second defendant(“BRC”), The Anglo Indonesia Corporation, asthe third defendant (“AIC”), RabobankInternational, as the fourth defendant and<strong>PT</strong> Air Muring (AM), a Subsidiary, as the fifthdefendant due to a claim argued byShamrock that arose from one of Shamrock’scustomers wherein Shamrock should pay apenalty of US$28.43 million.According to the arguments of Shamrock intheir claim, the penalty was charged againstShamrock because of its failure to deliver theorder. Based on Shamrock’s opinion thefailure was caused by the cancellation madeby PGI, BRC and AIC to sell their shares inAM to Shamrock.135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!