CRA Annual Report to Parliament 2011-2012 (PDF - Agence du ...
CRA Annual Report to Parliament 2011-2012 (PDF - Agence du ...
CRA Annual Report to Parliament 2011-2012 (PDF - Agence du ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Indica<strong>to</strong>r 2010-<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> Change<br />
Income tax disputes<br />
– resolved<br />
61,506 66,655 8.4%<br />
Income tax disputes<br />
– intake<br />
Commodity tax<br />
disputes – resolved<br />
Commodity tax<br />
disputes – intake<br />
CPP/EI disputes –<br />
resolved<br />
CPP/EI disputes –<br />
intake<br />
litigation<br />
If a matter is not resolved <strong>to</strong> the taxpayer’s satisfaction at<br />
the administrative review level, the taxpayer can appeal <strong>to</strong><br />
the Tax Court of Canada. This level of review is referred <strong>to</strong><br />
as litigation and is subject <strong>to</strong> the rules of the Tax Court.<br />
The issues that the Tax Court hears range from the<br />
application of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule, <strong>to</strong> transfer<br />
pricing issues, <strong>to</strong> Aboriginal taxation. In certain<br />
circumstances, taxpayers can appeal <strong>to</strong> the Federal Court<br />
of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada. Among other<br />
significant court cases, this year the Supreme Court of<br />
Canada upheld the <strong>CRA</strong>’s position on applying the General<br />
Anti-Avoidance Rule <strong>to</strong> corporate amalgamations, and it<br />
provided guidance on the scope of tax exemptions under<br />
the Indian Act.<br />
The Federal Court of Appeal confirmed our Minister’s<br />
statu<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>du</strong>ty <strong>to</strong> assess GST under the Excise Tax Act and<br />
resolved the gifting intent that is needed <strong>to</strong> claim<br />
donation tax credits.<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> these judicial developments, the <strong>CRA</strong><br />
collaborated with the Department of Justice on cases<br />
before the Supreme Court of Canada involving the<br />
residency of trusts under the Income Tax Act, the legal test<br />
applicable <strong>to</strong> farming losses under the Act, and the<br />
application of transfer pricing provisions under the Act<br />
and the guidelines of the Organisation for Economic<br />
Co-operation and Development.<br />
ANNUAL REPORT<br />
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
94,449 79,761 -15.6%<br />
7,613 7,299 -4.1%<br />
7,385 6,754 -8.5%<br />
3,011 2,967 -1.5%<br />
2,873 3,009 4.7%<br />
CANADA REVENUE AGENCY<br />
[taxpayer relief ]<br />
Taxpayer relief provisions allow the <strong>CRA</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel<br />
penalties and interest; accept late-filed, amended, or<br />
revoked income tax elections; and provide income tax<br />
refunds beyond the three-year period normally allowed.<br />
These provisions are intended <strong>to</strong> help taxpayers who are<br />
not able <strong>to</strong> meet their tax obligations because of<br />
extraordinary circumstances such as financial hardship,<br />
disasters such as floods or fire, or an error in a <strong>CRA</strong><br />
publication.<br />
In <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong>, we raised awareness of our taxpayer fairness<br />
instruments by improving our Web site; providing<br />
information <strong>to</strong> tax intermediaries; and reviewing guides,<br />
pamphlets, and other publications so that information is<br />
clear and consistent for all Canadians.<br />
Taxpayer relief provisions give us some flexibility and<br />
allow us <strong>to</strong> be more responsive in situations where it<br />
would be unreasonable or unfair <strong>to</strong> penalize the taxpayer.<br />
The <strong>to</strong>tal value of the relief provided <strong>to</strong> 204,740 taxpayers<br />
amounted <strong>to</strong> more than $362 million in <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong>.