09.03.2013 Views

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

Biological Species <strong>and</strong> Speciation—<br />

Mayr’s First Synthesis<br />

A Modern Unified Theory of <strong>Evolution</strong><br />

Ernst Mayr’s early interests in evolution <strong>and</strong> genetics (pp. 26–29, 45) led to his<br />

decisive contributions to the modern synthesis of the late 1930s <strong>and</strong> 1940s, when<br />

a largely unified evolutionary theory emerged. Biological evolution comprises two<br />

components–adaptive development of populations during long geological periods<br />

(anagenesis, evolution as such) <strong>and</strong> multiplication of species during relatively short<br />

periods (speciation, cladogenesis). <strong>Evolution</strong> as such <strong>and</strong> the theory of common<br />

descent were accepted by biologists within a few years of the publication of the Origin<br />

in 1859 during the first Darwinian revolution.Asynthesisofmoderngenetics<br />

<strong>and</strong> evolution as such was accomplished when, by 1932, the mathematical geneticists<br />

R.A. Fisher, J.B.S. Haldane <strong>and</strong> S. Wright had convincingly shown that small<br />

mutations<strong>and</strong>naturalselectionplaythemainrolesinthegradualprocessofadaptive<br />

evolution of populations through time, thereby solving one of the two major<br />

problems of evolutionary biology, the problem of anagenesis, a historical accomplishment<br />

which Mayr (1999k, 2004a) called the “Fisherian synthesis.” During the<br />

so-called <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Synthesis of the period 1937–1950 (the second Darwinian<br />

revolution) the other main problems of evolutionary biology were solved or generally<br />

accepted (gradualism, speciation, <strong>and</strong> natural selection) <strong>and</strong> the processes of<br />

speciation were combined with those of adaptive evolution (Mayr 1993a). None of<br />

the mathematical geneticists had discussed the phenomenon of speciation or did so<br />

only superficially. In general, the period of the modern synthesis, when a new unified<br />

theory of evolution originated, saw a synthesis (1) between the thinking in three<br />

major biological disciplines–genetics, systematics <strong>and</strong> paleontology, (2) between<br />

an experimental-reductionist approach (genetics) <strong>and</strong> an observational-holistic<br />

approach (naturalists-systematists) <strong>and</strong> (3) between an anglophone tradition with<br />

an emphasis on mathematics <strong>and</strong> adaptation <strong>and</strong> a continental European tradition<br />

with an emphasis on populations, species, <strong>and</strong> higher taxa. The three genetical<br />

aspects (then not new insights) that were firmly <strong>and</strong> universally adopted during<br />

the evolutionary synthesis were (1) that inheritance is hard, there is no inheritance<br />

of acquired characters, (2) that inheritance is particulate, that is, the genetic<br />

contributions of the parents do not blend but remain separate, to be differently<br />

recombined in future generations, <strong>and</strong> (3) that most mutations are very small <strong>and</strong><br />

evolution therefore is gradual. The evolutionary synthesis also led to a refutation<br />

of the three anti-Darwinian paradigms (a) the typological-saltational, (b) the<br />

teleological-orthogenetic <strong>and</strong> (c) the transformationist-lamarckian theories.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!