09.03.2013 Views

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Zoological Nomenclature 337<br />

should be modified <strong>and</strong> the continuity of the term preserved. Certain concepts<br />

of nomenclature changed over time, resulting in conflicts between the rules of<br />

naming by the early post-Linnaeans <strong>and</strong> the taxonomists in the late 19th century<br />

whoformulatedthecodesofnomenclature.<br />

Mayr was also active in cases of synonymy, not as a priority buff, but because<br />

he was seeking the right solution to a complex question. In a series of brief<br />

articles published between 1931 <strong>and</strong> 1986, he clarified the nomenclatural status<br />

of certain names of birds based on his superb knowledge of the ornithological<br />

literature <strong>and</strong> his familiarity with the Code of Nomenclature. Examples are Calao<br />

Bonnaterre (1931g), Egretta brevipes (1933e), Rhamphozosterops (1933o), several<br />

taxa of Aplonis starlings (1935a), Limosa lapponica menzbieri (1936e), the family<br />

name Meliphagidae (1944i), the Fijian Mountain Lorikeet Vini amabilis (1945a),<br />

the African Ploceus graueri (1945g), the Tibetan shrike Lanius tephronotus (1947g),<br />

Turdus musicus (1952h), Accipiter ferox (1956o), Heteralocha (1956p), the pigeons<br />

Treron griseicauda <strong>and</strong> T. pulverulenta (1956n), Ducula (Serresius) galeata (1957h),<br />

the snipes Gallinago (1963d) <strong>and</strong> the name of the fossil rail Rallus hodgeni of New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> (1986p).<br />

And, of course, Mayr participated actively in application to the International<br />

Commission of Zoological Nomenclature for the protection of names threatened<br />

by “name diggers.” The work connected with almost all of these applications took<br />

as much time as writing a scientific paper. Hence it is entirely justified to mention<br />

them here <strong>and</strong> to list their titles in the bibliography. In addition, other zoologists<br />

asked Mayr to support their applications as a co-author. His applications in the<br />

interest of nomenclatural stability include the following: To suppress J. R. Forster’s<br />

(1794) names for several Australian birds which had been overlooked universally<br />

(1952b), to suppress the names Drosophila brouni (1954a), Turdus musicus in favor<br />

of T. philomelos (1957c), the genus name Microura in favor of Pnoepyga (1961e,<br />

1963e), <strong>and</strong> to suppress eight dubious names based on young or damaged birds<br />

or on egg shells (1962c); to end confusion <strong>and</strong> establish the current usage of the<br />

generic names Tanagra <strong>and</strong> Euphonia (1963i), to accept Cardinalis Bonaparte,<br />

1838 for the congeneric Northern <strong>and</strong> Middle American species of Richmondena<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pyrrhuloxia (1964h), <strong>and</strong> to validate the names Cacatua Brisson (1964p) <strong>and</strong><br />

Lorius Vigors (1968d). The last proposals refer to two generic names introduced<br />

into the literature by Brisson (1760) which were Mayr’s early concern in a letter to<br />

Erwin Stresemann dated 2 July 1931. At that time the nomenclatural stability of<br />

the names of hundreds of genera of birds was threatened if Brisson’s names would<br />

be declared invalid unless accompanied by valid species names; Brisson’s generic<br />

names were finally accepted in 1955 (Bock 1994b; Melville 1995).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!