09.03.2013 Views

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Summary:<br />

Appreciation of Ernst Mayr’s Science<br />

As a young naturalist Ernst Mayr became familiar with the birds of his native<br />

Germany in the years after World War I <strong>and</strong> spent every free minute of his time in<br />

the woods <strong>and</strong> fields watching falcons, thrushes <strong>and</strong> warblers <strong>and</strong> along the lakes<br />

<strong>and</strong> rivers observing ducks <strong>and</strong> plovers. Following a family tradition he entered<br />

medical school in 1923, but soon came under the influence of Dr. Erwin Stresemann<br />

(1889–1972) in Berlin, the country’s leading ornithologist, who saw in this young<br />

student “a rising star, of fabulous systematic instinct.” He enticed him to switch to<br />

zoology by offering to place him on an expedition to the tropics after finishing his<br />

PhD dissertation. This had been Mayr’s dream since he was a boy <strong>and</strong> he could not<br />

resist. He moved to the University of Berlin <strong>and</strong> accepted a dissertation topic from<br />

Erwin Stresemann passing his PhD examination summa cum laude in June 1926.<br />

The foundation of all of Mayr’s later theoretical interests in species <strong>and</strong> speciation,<br />

evolution, <strong>and</strong> the history <strong>and</strong> philosophy of biology was laid during his<br />

student days. Already in 1924, when he was 19 years old, he discussed with Stresemann<br />

the species question, the analysis of phylogenetic relations among closely<br />

related bird species, rates of differentiation, <strong>and</strong> convergence (from a Lamarckian<br />

point of view). The subject of human inheritance <strong>and</strong> genetics fascinated him<br />

since he was a medical student. Already in 1927 Mayr deplored in print “how little<br />

geneticists <strong>and</strong> systematists cooperate even today.” Therefore he was enthusiastic<br />

when, after moving to New York in 1931, he read an article by T. Dobzhansky, a naturalist<br />

<strong>and</strong> geneticist from Russia, on the geographical variation in lady-beetles<br />

<strong>and</strong> exclaimed: “Here is finally a geneticist who underst<strong>and</strong>s us taxonomists!”<br />

They cooperated closely during the following years, especially after Dobzhansky<br />

had moved to Columbia University in New York City in late 1939, when they became<br />

close friends. From then on they discussed problems of the new systematics,<br />

genetical aspects of speciation <strong>and</strong> other topics of mutual interest.<br />

The Fisherian synthesis of the 1920s <strong>and</strong> early 1930s united the Darwinian theory<br />

of natural selection with modern genetics solving one of the two main problems<br />

of evolution, the problem of phyletic evolution of individual populations, through<br />

the work of the mathematical population geneticists R.A. Fisher (1930), S. Wright<br />

(1931), <strong>and</strong> J.B.S. Haldane (1932). The other main problem of evolution which the<br />

geneticists had left open, the origin of biodiversity or multiplication of species, was<br />

solved during the evolutionary synthesis (1937–1950), when Dobzhansky (1937),<br />

Mayr (1942e), Huxley (1942), Simpson (1944), Rensch (1947), Stebbins (1950) <strong>and</strong><br />

several other workers in the Old World established the synthetic theory of evolution.<br />

With the publication of his book, Systematics <strong>and</strong> the Origin of Species

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!