09.03.2013 Views

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Modern Unified Theory of <strong>Evolution</strong> 207<br />

the chances for a mutation to prevail.” He reemphasized (1931: 644) that speciation<br />

occurs only through spatial separation of populations (either through jump dispersal<br />

or disruption of the continuous range of the parental species) <strong>and</strong> pointed<br />

out the particularly favorable conditions for speciation on isl<strong>and</strong> archipelagoes<br />

like the Hawaii <strong>and</strong> Galapagos Isl<strong>and</strong>s. Speciation occurs in isolated populations<br />

through small mutations <strong>and</strong> natural selection. During the 1920s he had studied<br />

polymorphism in birds <strong>and</strong> had emphasized repeatedly that conspicuous morphs<br />

(“mutations”) have nothing to do with the origin of new species. Regarding ecological<br />

segregation in speciating populations, he concluded (1939: 360): “The correspondence<br />

of two forms may have been reduced to a correspondence of only their<br />

ecological requirements with, at the same time, divergent differentiation of their<br />

sexual activities. Two forms at that stage of the differentiation compete with each<br />

other for space <strong>and</strong> where they meet by range expansion, they abut sharply against<br />

each other without forming hybrids. […] Examples of such situations are probably<br />

much more common than currently known” (Haffer et al. 2000). He concluded<br />

that hybridization, after the removal of a geographical barrier between incipient<br />

species invariably leads to a secondary intergradation of these populations, <strong>and</strong><br />

not to speciation.<br />

However, Stresemann never prepared a general treatment of species <strong>and</strong> speciation,<br />

mainly because his main interests during the late 1920s had shifted to<br />

functional anatomy <strong>and</strong> physiology 8 <strong>and</strong> because he may have considered B. Rensch’s<br />

book of 1929 as having covered the subject sufficiently well.<br />

Bernhard Rensch (1928) introduced the concept of Artenkreis (superspecies<br />

Mayr 1931). In his book, The Principle of Polytypic Species <strong>and</strong> the Problem of<br />

Speciation (1929) Rensch showed that in many groups of animals numerous geographical<br />

taxa may be combined as subspecies of polytypic species. He also<br />

discussed numerous borderline cases between subspecies <strong>and</strong> species which document<br />

that in the majority of cases, species originate from geographically isolated<br />

populations. Conspicuous phenomena of geographical variation are described in<br />

Bergmann’s, Allen’s, <strong>and</strong> Gloger’s Rules. At that time, he interpreted these rules by<br />

a direct influence of the environment. His book was the first manifesto of “the new<br />

systematics” <strong>and</strong> Rensch the first “new systematist.” In further publications he<br />

explained the geographic principle, the geographical replacement of conspecific<br />

taxa, individual <strong>and</strong> geographical variation, superspecies, <strong>and</strong> speciation in what<br />

he called Instructions for zoological-systematic Studies (1934). He also demonstrated<br />

the adaptive nature of some subspecific differences in birds. No equivalent<br />

title for Rensch’s booklet of 1934 existed in the English literature until Mayr (1942e)<br />

published his volume which, in the first chapters, includes an introduction to taxonomic<br />

procedures. On June 6, 1941 Mayr wrote to Stresemann: “I am presently<br />

busy preparing my book manuscript on Systematics <strong>and</strong> the Origin of Species.One<br />

cannot deal with this topic without noticing all the time, how much the solution<br />

or at least the clear exposition of these problems owes to our friend Rensch.”<br />

8 “My real interests have shifted [from taxonomy <strong>and</strong> zoogeography] to very different fields,<br />

in particular functional anatomy <strong>and</strong> physiology” (letter to Mayr dated 14 October 1929<br />

<strong>and</strong> see p. 141, footnote).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!