09.03.2013 Views

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

Ornithology, Evolution, and Philosophy 123

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

348 11 History <strong>and</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> of Biology—Mayr’s Third Synthesis<br />

idea of the nonfixity of species. Darwin began writing the manuscript of his big<br />

species book in May 1856 after Lyell had urged him to publish his ideas lest he be<br />

scooped by someone else. This indeed almost happened, when A.R. Wallace sent<br />

Darwin a manuscript in 1858 which, in 1859, led to the publication of Darwin’s<br />

Origin, a story recounted many times.<br />

The “First Darwinian Revolution” of the late 19th century did not involve only<br />

a new theory of evolution, but an entirely new conceptual world, consisting of<br />

numerous separate concepts <strong>and</strong> beliefs. Among these are (1) an evolving rather<br />

than a constant <strong>and</strong> created world which is, in addition, not of recent but of<br />

great age, (2) the refutation of both catastrophism <strong>and</strong> a steady-state world, (3)<br />

refutation of the concept of an automatic upward evolution (cosmic teleology),<br />

(4) rejection of creationism, (5) replacement of the philosophies of essentialism<br />

<strong>and</strong> nominalism by population thinking, <strong>and</strong> (6) the abolition of anthropocentrism;<br />

Man was relegated to his place in the organic world. Because this intellectual<br />

revolution entailed the rejection of at least six widely held basic beliefs,<br />

it had a tremendous relevance outside of science causing a broad opposition to<br />

Darwin’s theses. Opponents were especially orthodox Christians, natural theologians,<br />

lay-persons, philosophers, physical scientists, <strong>and</strong> non-Darwinian biologists<br />

(Mayr 1972d). Darwin’s conceptualizations affected the thinking of average people<br />

<strong>and</strong> their worldview more than the work of Copernicus, Newton, Marx or Einstein.<br />

Darwin’s evolutionary paradigm. Darwin’s theoretical views of evolution comprised<br />

a set of at least five separate theses rather than one unified theory (Mayr 1982d,e,<br />

1985j, 1991g, 1997b, 2001f who spoke of five separate “theories”):<br />

(1) <strong>Evolution</strong> as such. This is the thesis that the world is not constant nor recently<br />

created nor perpetually cycling but rather is steadily changing <strong>and</strong> that<br />

organisms are transformed in time.<br />

(2) Common descent. Thisisthethesisthateverygroupoforganismsdescended<br />

from a common ancestor <strong>and</strong> that all groups of organisms, including animals,<br />

plants, <strong>and</strong> microorganisms, ultimately go back to a single origin of life on<br />

earth.<br />

(3) Multiplication of species. This thesis explains the origin of the enormous organic<br />

diversity. It postulates that species multiply, either by “splitting” into<br />

daughter species or by “budding,” that is, by the establishment of geographically<br />

isolated founder populations that evolve into new species.<br />

(4) Gradualism. According to this thesis, evolutionary change takes place through<br />

the gradual change of populations <strong>and</strong> not by the sudden (saltational) production<br />

of new individuals that represent a new type.<br />

(5) Natural selection. According to this thesis, evolutionary change comes about<br />

through the abundant production of genetic variation in every generation. The<br />

relatively few individuals who survive, owing to a particularly well-adapted<br />

combination of inheritable characters, give rise to the next generation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!