23.03.2013 Views

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 Noises and error sources 95<br />

is not significant. A charge limit is then derived by requiring that these spring constant<br />

terms do not upset the nominal spring constant from the electrostatic control system by<br />

more than 10 %.<br />

Summary of charge limits. The above charge limits for the LISA proof mass are<br />

summarised in Table 4.4 .. The most stringent limit comes from Lorentz force noise (note<br />

a factor of 10 is included to allow for some electromagnetic shielding from the partial<br />

titanium enclosure around the sensor). The next most critical effect is modification of the<br />

spring constant.<br />

Table 4.4 Summary of proof-mass charge limits and charge build up times<br />

Effect Charge Limit Charging Time<br />

[electrons/protons] [days]<br />

Lorentz force acceleration noise 2×10 6 0.7<br />

Electrostatic acceleration noise<br />

Stochastic charge arrival 4×10 10 1.4×10 4<br />

Displacement noise 5×10 8 187<br />

Control voltage noise 2×10 11 7×10 4<br />

Spring Constant 10 7 3.7<br />

Charge measurement using force modulation. The force modulation technique<br />

depends on applying oscillating potentials (dither voltages) to the electrode structure<br />

around the proof masses which then exert forces on the charged proof mass via the third<br />

term in equation 4.15. This induces an oscillatory motion in the proof mass which can<br />

be detected capacitively. The amplitude and phase of the response give the size of the<br />

charge and its sign. It turns out there is sufficient sensitivity in the displacement sensor<br />

for the dither to be applied in the transverse direction. If two opposing electrodes are<br />

used then the dither force is<br />

Fd = − Q<br />

<br />

<br />

∂C1 ∂C2<br />

V1 + V2 , (4.21)<br />

C ∂k ∂k<br />

where C is again the total capacitance and ∂Ci is the capacitance gradient associated with<br />

∂k<br />

an individual surface. Assuming the proof mass is reasonably well centred within the<br />

two opposing electrodes, such that ∂C1 ∂C2 ∂Co<br />

= − = and we apply equal and opposite<br />

∂k ∂k ∂k<br />

voltages to the two sides (i.e. V1 = −V2 = Vd) then the dither force is<br />

Fd = − 2QVd<br />

C<br />

∂Co<br />

∂k<br />

. (4.22)<br />

The charge measurement sensitivity is here defined as the charge, Qs, at which the induced<br />

acceleration just equals the system acceleration noise, ∆an :<br />

Qs = m∆anC<br />

−1 ∂Co<br />

. (4.23)<br />

2Vd ∂k<br />

Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!