Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.1 The interferometer 63<br />
signal should be stable enough to contribute a level of phase noise less than that from an<br />
arm length change of 2×10−12 m/ √ Hz , i.e. δφ < 1.2×10−5 rad/ √ Hz . The noise δF of<br />
the clock frequency F is related to the phase noise δφ at any frequency f by δF = f ×δφ,<br />
so at 10−3 Hz we require a clock with a noise δF ≤ 1.2×10−8 Hz/ √ Hz .<br />
If the clock frequency is, say, 15 MHz, the required relative stability of the clock is approximately<br />
8×10−16 / √ Hz, an Allan variance2 of 3×10−17 at 10−3 Hz. This demand is<br />
considerably stronger than can be fulfilled by any flight qualified USO currently available;<br />
for example the one used on the Mars Observer had an Allan variance of 2×10−13 at 10−3 Hz. The stability of the USO can however be improved to the desired level by<br />
modulating the clock frequency onto the laser light and stabilising this frequency to the<br />
arm length in a scheme analogous to that used to stabilise the laser frequency. To be<br />
more precise the USO in the master spacecraft is considered as the master oscillator in<br />
the system, and its phase fluctuations are measured by comparing the phase of the outgoing<br />
200 MHz modulation sidebands with the incoming ones in one arm, the incoming<br />
ones being offset by a given frequency determined by an NPRO on the distant spacecraft.<br />
The presence of this offset is essential to allow the phase measuring system to separate<br />
the signals related to the beating of the sidebands from the signals related to the beating<br />
of the carriers. It should be noted that the phase measuring system requires an accurate<br />
measurement of the relevant Doppler signal also to be given to it.<br />
Note that the USO on each craft is effectively phase locked to the master USO by controlling<br />
an NPRO on the output of each by means of a signal derived from the beating<br />
of the modulation sidebands on the incoming and outgoing light. This is elaborated in<br />
Section 4.3.3 .<br />
3.1.7 Thermal stability<br />
A high level of thermal stability is required by the interferometer. Thermal variation<br />
of the optical cavity to which the lasers are stabilized introduces phase variations in<br />
the interferometer signal, which have to be corrected for by using data from the two<br />
arms separately. Thermally induced variations in the dimensions of the transmit/receive<br />
telescope will lead to changes in the optical path length. Variations in the dimensions of<br />
the spacecraft will change the positions of components which cause a change in the mass<br />
distribution and hence cause an acceleration of the proof mass.<br />
The thermal stability needed is achieved by using structural materials with low thermal<br />
expansion coefficient and by using multiple stages of thermal isolation. The spacecraft and<br />
payload structural elements will be made of composite materials with thermal expansion<br />
coefficient less than 1×10−6 /K. The optical bench and telescope are supported by the<br />
payload cylinder which is weakly thermally coupled to the payload thermal shield which<br />
in turn is weakly coupled to the spacecraft body. This provides three stages of thermal<br />
isolation for the payload from solar and spacecraft electronics thermal input.<br />
The main source of thermal variation is due to changes in the solar intensity around its<br />
mean value of 1350 W m−2 . Observed insolation variations from 0.1 mHz to 10 mHz can<br />
2For a clock with white frequency noise, the relationship between the Allan variance and the relative<br />
frequency stability of the clock at a Fourier frequency f is given by σAllan = √ <br />
2ln2× δF/F × √ f .<br />
Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33