23.03.2013 Views

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1 Sensitivity 81<br />

averaged transfer function<br />

1<br />

10 −1<br />

10 −2<br />

10 −3<br />

ϑ=0 envelope<br />

10 −2<br />

10 −1<br />

frequency [Hz]<br />

declination δ = 0°<br />

δ = 30°<br />

δ = 60°<br />

δ = 90°<br />

Figure 4.2 Magnitude of the normalised LISA transfer function in dependence<br />

upon frequency after averaging over the orbit and all possible source azimuths<br />

and polarisations, shown for source declinations of 0 ◦ (red), 30 ◦ (green),<br />

60 ◦ (blue) and 90 ◦ (yellow). For comparison, also shown are the envelope for<br />

normal incidence (black), the same line reduced by √ 5 (black, broken line)<br />

and the transfer function proper for such a case (white).<br />

optimal directions and polarizations. The measurement time is generally assumed to be<br />

1 year, even though the lifetime of LISA would make longer measurement times possible.<br />

It is with these assumptions that the sensitivity curves in the figures of Section 1.2 have<br />

been drawn.<br />

4.1.3 The noise types.<br />

The sensitivity of LISA is determined by a wide variety of noise sources, and by the<br />

degree to which their effects can be kept small. There are two main categories of such<br />

sensitivity-limiting noise effects:<br />

• A first one that fakes fluctuations in the lengths of the optical paths, which we<br />

will call optical-path noise. This category of disturbances includes different types of<br />

noise discussed earlier, such as shot noise and beam pointing instabilities. These<br />

contributions will, in general, be uncorrelated, and therefore adding quadratically<br />

the four contributions from the four passes gives the final (apparent) fluctuation in<br />

optical path difference.<br />

• The second category is due to forces (or accelerations) acting on the proof masses.<br />

The drag-free environment will effectively shield the proof masses from outside influences,<br />

but some residual acceleration noise will remain. These accelerations will<br />

lead to displacement errors δx of the proof masses, and for each pass these errors<br />

have to be counted twice to arrive at the (real) fluctuation in optical path difference.<br />

Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33<br />

10 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!