Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.1 Sensitivity 81<br />
averaged transfer function<br />
1<br />
10 −1<br />
10 −2<br />
10 −3<br />
ϑ=0 envelope<br />
10 −2<br />
10 −1<br />
frequency [Hz]<br />
declination δ = 0°<br />
δ = 30°<br />
δ = 60°<br />
δ = 90°<br />
Figure 4.2 Magnitude of the normalised LISA transfer function in dependence<br />
upon frequency after averaging over the orbit and all possible source azimuths<br />
and polarisations, shown for source declinations of 0 ◦ (red), 30 ◦ (green),<br />
60 ◦ (blue) and 90 ◦ (yellow). For comparison, also shown are the envelope for<br />
normal incidence (black), the same line reduced by √ 5 (black, broken line)<br />
and the transfer function proper for such a case (white).<br />
optimal directions and polarizations. The measurement time is generally assumed to be<br />
1 year, even though the lifetime of LISA would make longer measurement times possible.<br />
It is with these assumptions that the sensitivity curves in the figures of Section 1.2 have<br />
been drawn.<br />
4.1.3 The noise types.<br />
The sensitivity of LISA is determined by a wide variety of noise sources, and by the<br />
degree to which their effects can be kept small. There are two main categories of such<br />
sensitivity-limiting noise effects:<br />
• A first one that fakes fluctuations in the lengths of the optical paths, which we<br />
will call optical-path noise. This category of disturbances includes different types of<br />
noise discussed earlier, such as shot noise and beam pointing instabilities. These<br />
contributions will, in general, be uncorrelated, and therefore adding quadratically<br />
the four contributions from the four passes gives the final (apparent) fluctuation in<br />
optical path difference.<br />
• The second category is due to forces (or accelerations) acting on the proof masses.<br />
The drag-free environment will effectively shield the proof masses from outside influences,<br />
but some residual acceleration noise will remain. These accelerations will<br />
lead to displacement errors δx of the proof masses, and for each pass these errors<br />
have to be counted twice to arrive at the (real) fluctuation in optical path difference.<br />
Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33<br />
10 0