Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.8 The LISA concept 47<br />
telescopes and 11 ◦ inclination of the orbits to the ecliptic, the optical axis of one of the<br />
telescopes will pass within 15 ◦ of the sun roughly 40 % of the time. Earlier theoretical<br />
studies of this problem indicated that a combination of multilayer UV and IR reflecting<br />
filters plus a narrowband optical transmitting filter could reduce incident sunlight by a<br />
sufficient amount, but such filters have not been designed in detail or constructed. The<br />
problem of constructing such filters appears to be made even more difficult if they need<br />
to be 30 cm in diameter, rather than the 15 cm diameter assumed in the earlier studies.<br />
A third technological issue concerns the need for generating an extremely stable clock<br />
frequency for use in cancelling out the Doppler shifts in the observed signals. For the<br />
geocentric mission, the Doppler shifts vary with about 27 day period between plus and<br />
minus 300 MHz. This is more than two orders of magnitude larger than the difference in<br />
Doppler shifts for the two preferred arms of the LISA interferometer, for which the initial<br />
orbit conditions are chosen to keep the Doppler shifts low, and a factor 20 higher than<br />
for the third arm in LISA. Thus, while LISA can determine the phase noise in its Ultra<br />
Stable Oscillators (USOs) to sufficient accuracy by fairly simple means, as discussed later,<br />
this task is considerably more difficult for the geocentric mission.<br />
For LISA, roughly 200 MHz sidebands generated from the USO are modulated onto the<br />
laser beams, with roughly 10 % of the power in the sidebands. Measurements of phase<br />
jitter in the beats between the sidetones and the carrier after transmission over an interferometer<br />
arm determine the phase noise in the USO. However, for the geocentric mission,<br />
two separate lasers with a difference frequency of perhaps 5 GHz probably would need to<br />
be used. Thus, the number of lasers that must survive in at least four of the spacecraft<br />
is doubled, since the accuracy of the results would be very strongly degraded if accurate<br />
corrections for the Doppler shifts were not available. If optical modulators with 5 GHz<br />
or higher frequencies and substantial sideband power are used instead of two separate<br />
lasers, the efficiency and long term reliability of the modulators are much more significant<br />
technological challenges than for the roughly 200 MHz modulators needed for LISA.<br />
In view of the three important technological issues discussed above and the loss in sensitivity<br />
for a geocentric mission if tighter requirements are not imposed on the inertial<br />
sensors, we believe that the LISA approach of using heliocentric orbits should be preferred.<br />
Cost is clearly a very important issue, but we expect that the main cost drivers<br />
for a gravitational-wave mission will continue to be the design and construction of the<br />
individual spacecraft and payloads, and in insuring the reliability of all of the systems<br />
that have to work simultaneously in at least four of the six optical assemblies.<br />
2.8 The LISA concept<br />
2.8.1 Overview<br />
Conceptually, the idea of implementing an interferometer in space is straightforward,<br />
but the practical realisation requires an intricate blend of optical technology, spacecraft<br />
engineering and control. For a start, the interferometer mirrors can not simply float freely<br />
in space — they must be contained inside spacecraft. Nonetheless, they can be arranged<br />
to be floating almost freely inside the spacecraft, protected from external disturbances by<br />
Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33