Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
102 Chapter 4 Measurement Sensitivity<br />
N ≈ n1(f)L2 − n2(f)L1<br />
L1<br />
(4.52)<br />
H ≈ h(f) L1 + L2<br />
. (4.53)<br />
L1<br />
From the above expressions for P (f), it is clear that the laser phase noise can be corrected<br />
for to the measurement noise level N(f) if the arm lengths are known accurately enough,<br />
and if the measurement system has sufficient dynamic range.<br />
In general, we assume that the difference in length of the two arms is known to 200 m, and<br />
the mean length to 20 km. The error in the arm length difference can then cause an error<br />
of 4×10 −9 of the laser phase noise at f =1mHz,and4×10 −10 at f =0.1 mHz. If the<br />
fractional difference in arm lengths is 1%, the errors in the laser phase noise corrections<br />
due to the uncertainty in the mean arm length are the same magnitude as the values<br />
given above.<br />
Our model for the laser phase noise before correction at frequencies of 0.1 mHz to 1 Hz<br />
is based on the thermal stability of the reference cavity to which the laser in spacecraft<br />
1 is locked for frequencies below about 3 mHz, plus the noise in locking to the<br />
cavity at higher frequencies. Our estimate for the locking noise comes from the results<br />
of Salomon et al. [109]. As a typical case, we take the fractional frequency noise in the<br />
laser to be 2×10−11 / √ Hz at 0.1 mHz, 1×10−13 / √ Hz at 1 mHz, and 2×10−15 / √ Hz at<br />
10 mHz. As an example, the frequency noise at 1 mHz corresponds to a phase noise level<br />
of 5×10−3 m/ √ Hz . To correct for this to a measurement noise level of 4 pm/ √ Hz requires<br />
a phase noise reduction of a factor 8×10−10 .<br />
The measurement of the difference in arm length for arms 1 and 2 is then corrected for the<br />
laser phase noise, using the approximately known lengths of the arms. The requirement on<br />
knowing the difference in arm lengths is about 200 m, as assumed earlier. The arm lengths<br />
will be determined by combining ground tracking of the spacecraft with the observed arm<br />
length changes from the laser phase measurements, or, alternatively, by measuring a group<br />
delay with a modulation tone on the laser beam. If the arm lengths are very close to equal,<br />
the noise at the harmonics of the round-trip travel frequency will be less well determined,<br />
but the accuracy will still be sufficient for correcting the measured arm length difference.<br />
A similar process is used to correct the time series of the length of arm 3 minus the average<br />
for arms 1 and 2.<br />
The advantage of on-board correction for the laser phase noise is that the data can be<br />
compressed by a factor of perhaps 5 before they are transmitted to the ground. This is<br />
because the arm length changes will be very smooth and the gravitational wave signals<br />
relatively small. The one disadvantage of having to correct for the laser phase noise is<br />
that a small fractional error will be made in the amplitude and phase of the gravitational<br />
wave signals in some cases. However, this error appears to be correctable for sources<br />
where the source direction and polarization can be determined.<br />
4.3.3 Clock noise<br />
An ultra-stable oscillator (USO) is required onboard for the phase measurements, for<br />
compensation of the orbital Doppler shifts, and for providing offset frequencies for laser<br />
3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08