23.03.2013 Views

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 Chapter 4 Measurement Sensitivity<br />

N ≈ n1(f)L2 − n2(f)L1<br />

L1<br />

(4.52)<br />

H ≈ h(f) L1 + L2<br />

. (4.53)<br />

L1<br />

From the above expressions for P (f), it is clear that the laser phase noise can be corrected<br />

for to the measurement noise level N(f) if the arm lengths are known accurately enough,<br />

and if the measurement system has sufficient dynamic range.<br />

In general, we assume that the difference in length of the two arms is known to 200 m, and<br />

the mean length to 20 km. The error in the arm length difference can then cause an error<br />

of 4×10 −9 of the laser phase noise at f =1mHz,and4×10 −10 at f =0.1 mHz. If the<br />

fractional difference in arm lengths is 1%, the errors in the laser phase noise corrections<br />

due to the uncertainty in the mean arm length are the same magnitude as the values<br />

given above.<br />

Our model for the laser phase noise before correction at frequencies of 0.1 mHz to 1 Hz<br />

is based on the thermal stability of the reference cavity to which the laser in spacecraft<br />

1 is locked for frequencies below about 3 mHz, plus the noise in locking to the<br />

cavity at higher frequencies. Our estimate for the locking noise comes from the results<br />

of Salomon et al. [109]. As a typical case, we take the fractional frequency noise in the<br />

laser to be 2×10−11 / √ Hz at 0.1 mHz, 1×10−13 / √ Hz at 1 mHz, and 2×10−15 / √ Hz at<br />

10 mHz. As an example, the frequency noise at 1 mHz corresponds to a phase noise level<br />

of 5×10−3 m/ √ Hz . To correct for this to a measurement noise level of 4 pm/ √ Hz requires<br />

a phase noise reduction of a factor 8×10−10 .<br />

The measurement of the difference in arm length for arms 1 and 2 is then corrected for the<br />

laser phase noise, using the approximately known lengths of the arms. The requirement on<br />

knowing the difference in arm lengths is about 200 m, as assumed earlier. The arm lengths<br />

will be determined by combining ground tracking of the spacecraft with the observed arm<br />

length changes from the laser phase measurements, or, alternatively, by measuring a group<br />

delay with a modulation tone on the laser beam. If the arm lengths are very close to equal,<br />

the noise at the harmonics of the round-trip travel frequency will be less well determined,<br />

but the accuracy will still be sufficient for correcting the measured arm length difference.<br />

A similar process is used to correct the time series of the length of arm 3 minus the average<br />

for arms 1 and 2.<br />

The advantage of on-board correction for the laser phase noise is that the data can be<br />

compressed by a factor of perhaps 5 before they are transmitted to the ground. This is<br />

because the arm length changes will be very smooth and the gravitational wave signals<br />

relatively small. The one disadvantage of having to correct for the laser phase noise is<br />

that a small fractional error will be made in the amplitude and phase of the gravitational<br />

wave signals in some cases. However, this error appears to be correctable for sources<br />

where the source direction and polarization can be determined.<br />

4.3.3 Clock noise<br />

An ultra-stable oscillator (USO) is required onboard for the phase measurements, for<br />

compensation of the orbital Doppler shifts, and for providing offset frequencies for laser<br />

3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!