Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.1 Theory of gravitational radiation 9<br />
of this, no real particle experiences only the local part of the external gravitational<br />
field. When a neutron star falls in the gravitational field of some other body (another<br />
neutron star or a massive black hole), its own gravitational field is accelerated<br />
with it, and far from the system this time-dependent field assumes the form of a<br />
gravitational wave. The loss of energy and momentum to gravitational radiation<br />
is accompanied by a gravitational radiation reaction force that changes the motion<br />
of the star. These reaction effects have been observed in the Hulse-Taylor binary<br />
pulsar [6], and they will be observable in the radiation from merging black holes<br />
and from neutron stars falling into massive black holes. They will allow LISA to<br />
perform more stringent quantitative tests of general relativity than are possible with<br />
the Hulse-Taylor pulsar. The reaction effects are relatively larger for more massive<br />
“particles”, so the real trajectory of a star will depend on its mass, despite the<br />
equivalence principle. The equivalence principle only holds strictly in the limit of a<br />
particle of small mass.<br />
This “failure” of the equivalence principle does not, of course, affect the selfconsistency<br />
of general relativity. The field equations of general relativity are partial<br />
differential equations, and they incorporate the equivalence principle as applied to<br />
matter in infinitesimally small volumes of space and lengths of time. Since the mass<br />
in such regions is infinitesimally small, the equivalence principle does hold for the<br />
differential equations. Only when the effects of gravity are added up over the whole<br />
mass of a macroscopic body does the motion begin to deviate from that predicted<br />
by the equivalence principle.<br />
• Special relativity. The second foundation stone of general relativity is special<br />
relativity. Indeed, this is what led to the downfall of Newtonian gravity: as an instantaneous<br />
theory, Newtonian gravity was recognized as obsolete as soon as special<br />
relativity was accepted. Many of general relativity’s most distinctive predictions<br />
originate in its conformance to special relativity.<br />
General relativity incorporates special relativity through the equivalence principle:<br />
local freely falling observers see special relativity physics. That means, in particular,<br />
that nothing moves faster than light, that light moves at the same speed c with<br />
respect to all local inertial observers at the same event, and that phenomena like<br />
time dilation and the equivalence of mass and energy are part of general relativity.<br />
Black holes in general relativity are regions in which gravity is so strong that the<br />
escape speed is larger than c : this is the Michell-Laplace definition as well. But<br />
because nothing moves faster than c, all matter is trapped inside the black hole,<br />
something that Michell and Laplace would not have expected. Moreover, because<br />
light can’t stand still, light trying to escape from a black hole does not move outwards<br />
and then turn around and fall back in, as would an ordinary particle; it never makes<br />
any outward progress at all. Instead, it falls inwards towards a complicated, poorlyunderstood,<br />
possibly singular, possibly quantum-dominated region in the center of<br />
the hole.<br />
The source of the Newtonian gravitational field is the mass density. Because of<br />
E = mc2 , we would naturally expect that all energy densities would create gravity<br />
in a relativistic theory. They do, but there is more. Different freely falling observers<br />
Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33