23.03.2013 Views

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.1 Theory of gravitational radiation 9<br />

of this, no real particle experiences only the local part of the external gravitational<br />

field. When a neutron star falls in the gravitational field of some other body (another<br />

neutron star or a massive black hole), its own gravitational field is accelerated<br />

with it, and far from the system this time-dependent field assumes the form of a<br />

gravitational wave. The loss of energy and momentum to gravitational radiation<br />

is accompanied by a gravitational radiation reaction force that changes the motion<br />

of the star. These reaction effects have been observed in the Hulse-Taylor binary<br />

pulsar [6], and they will be observable in the radiation from merging black holes<br />

and from neutron stars falling into massive black holes. They will allow LISA to<br />

perform more stringent quantitative tests of general relativity than are possible with<br />

the Hulse-Taylor pulsar. The reaction effects are relatively larger for more massive<br />

“particles”, so the real trajectory of a star will depend on its mass, despite the<br />

equivalence principle. The equivalence principle only holds strictly in the limit of a<br />

particle of small mass.<br />

This “failure” of the equivalence principle does not, of course, affect the selfconsistency<br />

of general relativity. The field equations of general relativity are partial<br />

differential equations, and they incorporate the equivalence principle as applied to<br />

matter in infinitesimally small volumes of space and lengths of time. Since the mass<br />

in such regions is infinitesimally small, the equivalence principle does hold for the<br />

differential equations. Only when the effects of gravity are added up over the whole<br />

mass of a macroscopic body does the motion begin to deviate from that predicted<br />

by the equivalence principle.<br />

• Special relativity. The second foundation stone of general relativity is special<br />

relativity. Indeed, this is what led to the downfall of Newtonian gravity: as an instantaneous<br />

theory, Newtonian gravity was recognized as obsolete as soon as special<br />

relativity was accepted. Many of general relativity’s most distinctive predictions<br />

originate in its conformance to special relativity.<br />

General relativity incorporates special relativity through the equivalence principle:<br />

local freely falling observers see special relativity physics. That means, in particular,<br />

that nothing moves faster than light, that light moves at the same speed c with<br />

respect to all local inertial observers at the same event, and that phenomena like<br />

time dilation and the equivalence of mass and energy are part of general relativity.<br />

Black holes in general relativity are regions in which gravity is so strong that the<br />

escape speed is larger than c : this is the Michell-Laplace definition as well. But<br />

because nothing moves faster than c, all matter is trapped inside the black hole,<br />

something that Michell and Laplace would not have expected. Moreover, because<br />

light can’t stand still, light trying to escape from a black hole does not move outwards<br />

and then turn around and fall back in, as would an ordinary particle; it never makes<br />

any outward progress at all. Instead, it falls inwards towards a complicated, poorlyunderstood,<br />

possibly singular, possibly quantum-dominated region in the center of<br />

the hole.<br />

The source of the Newtonian gravitational field is the mass density. Because of<br />

E = mc2 , we would naturally expect that all energy densities would create gravity<br />

in a relativistic theory. They do, but there is more. Different freely falling observers<br />

Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!