Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8 Chapter 1 Scientific Objectives<br />
1.1 Theory of gravitational radiation<br />
1.1.1 General relativity<br />
There are a number of good textbooks that introduce general relativity and gravitational<br />
waves, with their astrophysical implications [1, 2, 3, 4]. We present here a very brief<br />
introduction to the most important ideas, with a minimum of mathematical detail. A<br />
discussion in the same spirit that deals with other experimental aspects of general relativity<br />
is in Reference [5].<br />
Foundations of general relativity. General relativity rests on two foundation stones:<br />
the equivalence principle and special relativity. By considering each in turn, we can learn<br />
a great deal about what to expect from general relativity and gravitational radiation.<br />
• Equivalence principle. This originates in Galileo’s observation that all bodies fall<br />
in a gravitational field with the same acceleration, regardless of their mass. From<br />
the modern point of view, that means that if an experimenter were to fall with<br />
the acceleration of gravity (becoming a freely falling local inertial observer), then<br />
every local experiment on free bodies would give the same results as if gravity were<br />
completely absent: with the common acceleration removed, particles would move at<br />
constant speed and conserve energy and momentum.<br />
The equivalence principle is embodied in Newtonian gravity, and its importance has<br />
been understood for centuries. By assuming that it applied to light — that light<br />
behaved just like any particle — eighteenth century physicists predicted black holes<br />
(Michell and Laplace) and the gravitational deflection of light (Cavendish and von<br />
Söldner), using only Newton’s theory of gravity.<br />
The equivalence principle leads naturally to the point of view that gravity is geometry.<br />
If all bodies follow the same trajectory, just depending on their initial velocity<br />
and position but not on their internal composition, then it is natural to associate<br />
the trajectory with the spacetime itself rather than with any force that depends<br />
on properties of the particle. General relativity is formulated mathematically as a<br />
geometrical theory, but our approach to it here will be framed in the more accessible<br />
language of forces.<br />
The equivalence principle can only hold locally, that is in a small region of space and<br />
for a short time. The inhomogeneity of the Earth’s gravitational field introduces<br />
differential accelerations that must eventually produce measurable effects in any<br />
freely-falling experiment. These are called tidal effects, because tides on the Earth<br />
are caused by the inhomogeneity of the Moon’s field. So tidal forces are the part<br />
of the gravitational field that cannot be removed by going to a freely falling frame.<br />
General relativity describes how tidal fields are generated by sources. Gravitational<br />
waves are time-dependent tidal forces, and gravitational wave detectors must sense<br />
the small tidal effects.<br />
Ironically, the equivalence principle never holds exactly in real situations in general<br />
relativity, because real particles (e.g. neutron stars) carry their gravitational fields<br />
along with them, and these fields always extend far from the particle. Because<br />
3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08