Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
22 Chapter 1 Scientific Objectives<br />
that the performance of LISA could in principle turn out to be significantly better<br />
than shown.<br />
2. LISA is likely to have a significantly longer lifetime than one year. The mission is<br />
planned for 2 years, but it could last up to 10 years without exhausting on-board<br />
supplies. As described above, its sensitivity to long-lived sources improves as the<br />
square root of the mission duration. Not only would this lower the noise and threshold<br />
curves, but it would also lower any gravitational-wave noise from white-dwarf<br />
binaries, since LISA would resolve more of those sources and remove them from this<br />
confusion-limited background.<br />
3. LISA will actually have three arms, not two. LISA’s third arm provides necessary<br />
redundancy for the success of the mission, but it also has an important scientific<br />
benefit: it allows LISA to detect two distinct gravitational wave observables, which<br />
can be thought of as formed from the signals of two different interferometers, with<br />
on arm common to both. This improves both the sensitivity of LISA and its ability<br />
to measure parameters, particularly the polarisation of the waves. The sensitivity<br />
shown in Figure 1.3 is only for a single interferometer.<br />
The two interferometers are not perfectly orthogonal, since they are not oriented at 45◦ to each other. But they are oriented differently enough so that two distinct, linearly independent<br />
gravitational-wave observables can be formed, with similar signal-to-noise ratios.<br />
One is the difference in arm length for the two arms of the “primary” interferometer. The<br />
other is the length of the third arm minus the average of the lengths of the other two<br />
arms.<br />
The fact that the two interfermometers share a common arm means that they will have<br />
common noise. Most of the signals in Figure 1.3 have signal-to-noise ratios that are so<br />
large that the likelihood that the signal is caused by noise will be negligible; in this case,<br />
the information from the two interferometers can be used to obtain extra polarization<br />
and direction information. This will be particularly helpful for observations of relatively<br />
short-lived sources, such as the coalescences of 10 6 M⊙ black holes, where the signal does<br />
not last long enough to take full advantage of the amplitude and frequency modulation<br />
produced by LISA’s orbital motion.<br />
For signals nearer the noise limit, the second observable will still provide some increase<br />
in the confidence of detection. Using three arms could increase the effective signal-tonoise<br />
ratio by perhaps 20 %. And for stochastic backgrounds, the third arm will help<br />
to discriminate such backgrounds as produced by binaries and cosmological effects from<br />
anomalous instrumental noise. This will be considered in detail in Section 4.4 below.<br />
The frequency of radiation emitted by a source of mass M and size R will normally be<br />
of the same order as its natural gravitational dynamical frequency, as in Equation 1.12,<br />
recalling that the gravitational wave frequency is twice the orbital frequency1 :<br />
f GW = 1<br />
2π ω GW = 1<br />
π<br />
GM<br />
R 3<br />
1/2<br />
=3.7×10 −3<br />
1/2 <br />
M<br />
R<br />
1 M⊙ 1×108 m<br />
−3/2<br />
Hz. (1.16)<br />
1 An exception is a system which is emitting much less radiation than the upper limit in Equation 1.9,<br />
such as a slowly rotating neutron star with a small lump on it. We do not expect any such sources to be<br />
prominent at low frequencies.<br />
3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08