Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24 Chapter 1 Scientific Objectives<br />
have more secure models of these systems and will in addition be able to estimate the<br />
distance to the binary from the gravitational-wave amplitude and the estimated masses.<br />
The orientation angle of the plane of the orbit will be interesting if other orientationdependent<br />
phenomena are observed, such as jets or optical/radio/X-ray polarisation. The<br />
large majority of galactic binaries will not be known in advance, but can be located on<br />
the sky from the frequency modulation that the motion of LISA produces in their signals,<br />
and to some extent also from the amplitude modulation. This is discussed in Section 4.4 .<br />
Neutron star binaries. The best-known two-neutron-star (NS-NS) binaryisthefamous<br />
Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar PSR B1913+16, discovered in 1975 [17]. Its orbital period<br />
of 7.68 hrs places it below the LISA band, but it is important to LISA as the best-studied<br />
member of a class of binaries that should be important sources. The Hulse-Taylor binary<br />
is decaying due to the loss of orbital energy to gravitational waves at exactly the rate<br />
predicted by general relativity [6]. PSR B1913+16 will coalesce to a single star in 3×108 years. Two other very similar systems are known. By considering the selection effects<br />
in the detection of such systems, a recent detailed study [18] arrived at a conservative<br />
estimate of N ∼ 103 such systems in the Galaxy, formed at a rate of about one per 105 yr.<br />
Theoretical calculations of binary evolution give a wide variety of estimates of the number<br />
of such systems. Most of them [19, 20, 21] give rather higher rates than the observational<br />
estimates. It is possible, therefore, that observations give a lower bound on the number<br />
of such systems, but that some fraction of the population does not turn up in pulsar<br />
surveys. It may be that not all neutron stars turn on as pulsars, or even that binaries like<br />
PSR B1913+16 may be merely the long-period tail of a distribution of binaries that are<br />
formed with periods as short as an hour and which decay so rapidly through the emission<br />
of gravitational radiation that one would not expect to see any such systems in pulsar<br />
surveys. In this case the formation rate could be as high as one per 3 000 yr, leading to<br />
a total population of N ∼ 3×106 systems. Moreover, recent observations of the binary<br />
pulsar PSR J1012+5307, whose companion is a white dwarf that is much younger than<br />
the apparent age of the pulsar as estimated from is spin-down rate, have suggested that<br />
millisecond pulsar spindown may overestimate the pulsar’s true age [22]. Since binary pulsars<br />
tend to be millisecond pulsars, this could also raise the binary neutron-star birthrate.<br />
For a recent overview of this subject, see [23].<br />
Another indication of this population comes from gamma-ray bursts [24]. From optical<br />
identifications of some recent bursts, it is now known that these events occur at immense<br />
distances [25]. Although the events are not understood in detail, it seems that they could<br />
involve coalescences of neutron stars with other neutron stars or with black holes. Such<br />
events occur at the end of the gravitational-wave evolution of systems in the population<br />
of binaries we are considering here. Estimates of the size of the population from<br />
observations of gamma-ray bursts are consistent with the observational limits mentioned<br />
above. For example, the estimates above suggest that there could be of order 104 neutronstar/neutron-star<br />
coalescences per year out to a redshift of z = 1. About 1000 observable<br />
bursts are thought to occur each year, but it seems probable that bursts are beamed, so<br />
that the two rates would be consistent for a 10 % beaming factor. If bursts are spread to<br />
greater distances (one has been seen beyond z = 3), the rates are not consistent unless the<br />
beams are very narrow, or unless the more distant bursts come from neutron-star/blackhole<br />
mergers (see the next section), which could indeed emit stronger bursts, according<br />
3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08