Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.4 Orbit configuration stability 139<br />
Another alternative to reduce the noise caused by the Doppler shifts would be to modulate<br />
the laser beams with a signal based on the spacecraft oscillators [120]. In this scheme<br />
each arm would be essentially used as a delay line to stabilize the oscillators; the returned<br />
oscillator signal would be compared with the local oscillator signal and the difference<br />
would be used to measure fluctuations in the spacecraft oscillator. This scheme has been<br />
adopted as the nominal plan for the LISA mission.<br />
With this scheme it is still advantageous to have the arm rates-of-change small since this<br />
reduces the dynamic range of the oscillator signal. For example, with arm rates-of-change<br />
of 15 m/s and Doppler shifts of 30 MHz, it suffices to use a 200 MHz modulation derived<br />
from the spacecraft oscillators on the laser signal [121]. The modulation can be imposed<br />
using an electro-optical modulator already planned in the spacecraft payload for other<br />
purposes. This is somewhat simpler than the two-laser scheme outlined in Hellings et<br />
al. [120]. With these clock-noise reduction schemes there are a variety of possible choices<br />
of nominal orbits that give acceptable ranges of Doppler shift over the period of the<br />
mission.<br />
The nominal operational orbits selected have initial orbits that could, if necessary, be<br />
adjusted by small maneuvers each month to keep the rates-of-change of one pair of arms<br />
nearly the same throughout the mission. However, no maneuvers are planned if performance<br />
is nominal. Figure 6.1 is a plot of the arm rates of the rates-of-change of the<br />
three arm lengths for the nominal orbit configuration. (The orbits will change slightly in<br />
character depending on the chosen launch date.) The rate-of-change of arm length for two<br />
rate-of-change (m/s)<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
time (yrs)<br />
Figure 6.1 Nominal rates-of-change for the three arms of the LISA triangular<br />
spacecraft formation, with the spacecraft orbits evolving under only gravitational<br />
forces (i.e. with no maneuvers). The rates-of-change of the lengths of<br />
arm 1 (solid line) and arm 2 (dotted line) (see Figure 3.1) are almost identical<br />
for the first six months of the mission and could be kept nearly identical, if<br />
necessary, through the use of occasional small maneuvers.<br />
of the arms is almost identical for the first six months of the mission. The difference in<br />
rate-of-change of these two arms could be kept small through the use of small maneuvers.<br />
Corrected version 2.08 3-3-1999 9:33