23.03.2013 Views

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 Chapter 4 Measurement Sensitivity<br />

Adding all these contributions quadratically, one arrives at the total path length variation<br />

of 40×10−12 m/ √ Hz in the bottom line. It is this estimate of 40 pm/ √ Hz that formed<br />

the basis of the sensitivity curves in the figures of Section 1.2 .<br />

The shot noise contribution in Table 4.1 was calculated assuming a 1 W laser and a<br />

diameter of 0.30 m for the optics (see Section 3.1).<br />

Some of the major noise effects are discussed in more detail in the remainder of this<br />

section or in earlier sections.<br />

Laser phase noise. Another optical noise source creating spurious optical-path signals<br />

is the phase fluctuations of the master laser. The four lasers on the four spacecraft are<br />

phase-locked with each other, but with about 17 s time delays for two of them because of<br />

the length of the interferometer arms. The requirements for measuring and correcting for<br />

the laser phase noise are discussed in Section 4.3.2 .<br />

Thermal vibrations. The proof masses and the optical structures have their resonant<br />

frequencies orders of magnitude above the frequency range of the gravitational wave signals.<br />

Nevertheless, thermal vibrations (Brownian noise) can produce spurious signals. We<br />

are searching for signals whose frequencies are well below the lowest resonant frequencies<br />

of the optical structure. The (kT) thermal vibration noise is composed of the sub-resonant<br />

tails of the (various) structural resonances. These vibrations, per proof mass, have linear<br />

spectral densities δL(f) of apparent arm-length fluctuations of a general form<br />

δL(f) =<br />

<br />

4 kT<br />

MQω2 0 ω<br />

1/2 (4.5)<br />

if we assume the (noisier) displacement-dependent ‘structural damping’ (imaginary spring<br />

constant) [96]. These noise sources will be very small for LISA, so they are not included<br />

in Table 4.1.<br />

4.2.3 Acceleration noise budget<br />

Table 4.2 gives the error allocation for spurious accelerations, mainly of the individual<br />

proof masses, the allowed value (in units of 10−15 ms−2 / √ Hz at 10−4 Hz), and the number<br />

of such effects entering in one inertial sensor.<br />

The allowed total effect of acceleration noise for one inertial sensor is 3×10−15 ms−2 / √ Hz .<br />

The effect on the difference in geometrical arm lengths is then 6×10−15 ms−2 / √ Hz . It is<br />

with these values, after multiplication with factors 5 (SNR) and √ 5 (for orientation and<br />

polarisation), that the sensitivity curves of Figures 1.3 and 1.4 were drawn.<br />

To ease comparison of these acceleration errors with the allowed errors in optical path,<br />

the total was multiplied by two in the final line, to give 12×10−15 ms−2 / √ Hz . A multiplication<br />

with ω−2 will give the optical-path error due to the contributions in Table 4.2 .<br />

3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!