Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
112 Chapter 4 Measurement Sensitivity<br />
as operating effectively like a pair of two-arm interferometers that measure orthogonal<br />
polarisations.<br />
How is the noise in interferometer I correlated with that in interferometer II ? This has<br />
not yet been analyzed in detail. However one can show that if the detector noise in the<br />
three individual arms is totally symmetric (so that all three arms have the same rms<br />
noise amplitude, and the correlation between any pair of arms is also the same), then<br />
the noise correlations between interferometers I and II exactly cancel out; they can be<br />
regarded as statistically independent detectors [113]. As a first approximation, then, we<br />
treat the noises in interferometers I and II as uncorrelated. It seems unlikely that a small<br />
correlation between them would significantly affect the results presented below.<br />
A signal that is intrinsically monochromatic will be spread into a set of sidebands by the<br />
motion of the detector. The modulation contains all the information about the source<br />
position. This is illustrated in Figures 4.10 and 4.11, which show line spectra for one year<br />
of integration, for two different source locations. The frequency of the gravitational wave<br />
is 3 mHz and the dimensionless amplitude h+ equals one; the output of interferometer I<br />
is shown.<br />
0.50<br />
0.40<br />
0.30<br />
0.20<br />
0.10<br />
-20 -10 0<br />
Δf [year<br />
10 20<br />
-1<br />
0.00<br />
]<br />
Figure 4.10 Source at θ = π<br />
2 ,φ=0.<br />
0.50<br />
0.40<br />
0.30<br />
0.20<br />
0.10<br />
-20 -10 0<br />
Δf [year<br />
10 20<br />
-1<br />
0.00<br />
]<br />
Figure 4.11 Source at θ = π<br />
4 ,φ=0.<br />
Review of parameter estimation. The problem of measurement is to determine the<br />
values of some or all parameters of the signal [115]. It will be shown how accurately that<br />
can be done. In this section for simplicity we will consider a single datastream produced<br />
by a single interferometer (e.g., interferometer I); the generalization to a pair of outputs<br />
I and II is straightforward.<br />
Consider a stream s(t) that represents the pure detector output h(µ), parametrized by<br />
several unknown parameters µi collectively denoted as µ =(µ1 = θ, µ2 = φ,...)plus<br />
additional noise n(t) . Now one has to find a probability density function P(µ, s) for<br />
the parametrization µ that characterizes the detector output h(µ) . Assuming that n(t)<br />
is a Gaussian process with zero mean, characterized by the one-sided power spectral<br />
3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08