23.03.2013 Views

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

Pre-Phase A Report - Lisa - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 Chapter 4 Measurement Sensitivity<br />

4.4 Data analysis<br />

The objective on data analysis for a gravitational wave detector is to reconstruct as far<br />

as possible the incoming gravitational wave. From the reconstruction, it is possible to<br />

make the kind of inferences about sources that we have described in Chapter 1 . The<br />

parameters that describe the wave are:<br />

• Its direction on the sky in, say, galactic coordinates (ℓ, b). These are constants<br />

that must be maintained during the observation. Proper motion and parallax are<br />

unlikely because the observations of Galactic objects are unlikely to attain better<br />

than a few arcminutes directional accuracy. (A stochastic background will not have<br />

a precise direction, but that caused by binaries may be anisotropic on the scale of<br />

tens of degrees.)<br />

• Its amplitude and polarisation, or alternatively the amplitudes of two independent<br />

components h+ and h×, and their relative phase. For most LISA sources, these<br />

are constant in time, or at least very slowly varying. Binary orbital precession will<br />

cause an intrinsic amplitude modulation of the signal. As LISA orbits the Sun, the<br />

projection of the wave on the detector will change, which also causes an apparent<br />

amplitude modulation, even if the intrinsic amplitude and polarisation of the signal<br />

remain constant.<br />

• Signal phase Φ(t). Gravitational wave detectors are coherent detectors, because<br />

their operating frequencies are low enough to allow them to track the phase of the<br />

signal. The phase, as a function of time, contains interesting information if it is<br />

not regular: binaries that chirp, or even coalesce, provide important clues to their<br />

masses and distances in the phase function, and the phase function of a black-hole<br />

binary allows LISA to track the orbit to test general relativity.<br />

The extraction of this information from the LISA data will use the same principles that<br />

have been developed for ground-based interferometers. But there are a number of important<br />

differences from ground-based instruments:<br />

• LISA’s data rate will be 103 times less than a ground-based detector, because LISA<br />

operates at much lower frequencies. The massive data-handling problems faced by<br />

ground-based interferometers [110] will not exist for LISA. All its data for one year<br />

will fit on a single disc, and the computational demands of the analysis are modest.<br />

In this section we will assume that the signal stream for LISA will consist of two<br />

2-byte data samples per second. The actual data stream may be sampled more<br />

rapidly, but there is no useful gravitational wave signal data above 1 Hz, so the data<br />

stream will be anti-alias filtered and resampled at the Nyquist rate of 2 Hz.<br />

• LISA’s 3 arms form 2 independent detectors, in the sense that they record two independent<br />

components of the incoming gravitational wave. Ground-based detectors<br />

will also operate in groups of 2 or more for joint detection, but signal reconstruction<br />

and direction finding are very different, because the detectors are well-separated.<br />

LISA can, in the unfortunate event of the failure of one spacecraft, still reliably detect<br />

gravitational waves even operating as a single detector. This is possible because<br />

of the next important difference.<br />

3-3-1999 9:33 Corrected version 2.08

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!