30 January 1995-<strong>The</strong> ADO issues the <strong>Army</strong> Digitization Master Plan, stipulating that it is to be a living document that will be updated annually. 53 February 1995-<strong>The</strong> <strong>Army</strong> submits a report to Congress, prepared by the ADO, on <strong>Army</strong> Digitization in response to requirements specified in the FY 95 National Defense Authorization Act 54 31 March 1995-Mr. Decker, ASA(RDA) , approves the <strong>Army</strong> Technical Information Architecture for implementation. 55 April 1995-<strong>Army</strong> Science Board 1994 Summer Study Final Report on Technical Information Architecture for <strong>Army</strong> Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence is published 56 May 1995-MG Rigby publishes an article in <strong>Army</strong> magazine detailing the <strong>Army</strong>'s efforts to digitize its experimental force for the Force XXI AWEs.57 124 19 June 1995-Mr. Decker, as AAE, issues a policy memorandum on <strong>Army</strong> Digitization standards, enj oining on all involved in acquisition adherence to the standards spelled out in his 31 March 1995 memorandum approving the <strong>Army</strong> Technical Information Architecture 5S 29 November 1995-<strong>The</strong> General Accounting <strong>Of</strong>fice (GAO) issues a report criticizing the <strong>Army</strong>'s plan to digitize the battlefield as expensive, containing many risks, and lacking specific, measurable goals for the series of large-scale experiments that are to be conducted for Force XXI,5s 7 December 1995-<strong>The</strong> ADO forwards a proposed response to the GAO report to the AAE for his approval and forwarding to the Under Secretary of the <strong>Army</strong> for signature and dispatch to the GAO. <strong>The</strong> response largely rebuts the GAO's allegations that connoted sloppiness or poor deSign, supervision, or evaluation of the <strong>Army</strong>'s digitization and experimentation plans 60 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong>
I Interview, GEN (Ret.) Frederick M. Franks with Yarrison, 18 February 1997, pp. 24-25. Copies of all unpublished references, unless otherwise noted, are in the historian's files. 2 John L. Romjue, American <strong>Army</strong> Doctrine Jor the Post-Cold War. (Fort Monroe, VA , U.S. <strong>Army</strong> TRADOC <strong>Military</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>Of</strong>fice, 1996), pp. 73-74. Romjue cites (n. 36) and discusses Message , CG TRADOC to CAC and other commanders cited, 312240Z Mar 92, sub: Battle Space Command and Control. 3 Interview, COL (Ret.) John Klevecz with Dr. Susan Canedy, 16 July 1996, p. 7. 4 Message, GEN Franks to distribution, 271530Z Aug 92, sub : Commander's Intent: Battle Labs. 5 George H. Del Carlo, "A Glimpse of the Digitized Battlefield at <strong>The</strong> National Training <strong>Center</strong>," Landpower Essay Series, No. 93-7 (Arlington, VA : A<strong>US</strong>A Institute of Land Warfare, 1993), pp. 1-2. Interview, Franks with Yarrison, 18 February 1997, pp. 24-26. Franks's letter to Mountcastle, 23 February 1998, loco cit. In all those places and in Tom Clancy with Franks, Into the Storm: A Study in Command (pp. 509-51 0), Franks particularly notes the importance of his conversations, beginning at the NTC, with the platoon sergeant of the M lA2 platoon, then-SFC Philip Johndrow, and how those discussions opened his eyes to the possibilities for nearly every aspect of future warfare inherent in an accurate, common relevant picture of the battlefield. 6 Read-ahead packet for LAM Board of Directors, First Meeting, 14 October 1992, for the issue statement. Also, Message , Sullivan to distribution, 191223Z Oct 92, sub: <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> Board of Directors Meeting, 14 Oct 92; in LAM TF Files, Box5, File 4-2. 7 John W Cranston, U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Armor <strong>Center</strong> and Fort Knox Annual Command <strong>History</strong>, 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1993, pp. 63-64, for discussions of the experiment. See also John C. Johnston, "<strong>The</strong> Journey to Force XXI's Mounted Component," Armor, CIII:2 (March-April 1994), 14-16. 8 Headquarters, Department of the <strong>Army</strong> Concept Paper on Horizontal Technology Integration (HTI), 8 November 1993, enclosure to Memorandum for See Distribution, from MG Garner and MG Hite, 8 November 1993, sub : Horizontal Technology Integration (HTI) Concept Paper. 9 Message, DCG SigCen, to TRADOC Commandants and Cdrs and PEOs, 171928Z Mar 93, sub: Brigade and Below Data Distribution. 10 CSA Notes to LAM '93 War fighting Issues pages and other briefing slides from BoD II handouts and results, 3/5 March 1993. II Memorandum from GEN Reimer to Cdr, TRADOC, 11 March 1993, sub: Horizontal Technol- Appendixes Notes ogy Integration (HTI) . Memorandum from GEN Reimer to DCSOPS, 11 March 1993, same subject. SARD-SI Information Paper, 10 June 1993, sub: Interoperability of the Digital Battlefield. 12 Message, DCG SigCen, to TRADOC Commandants and Cdrs and PEs, 171928Z Mar 93, sub: Brigade and Below Data Distribution. 13 Message, GEN Franks personal for GEN Sullivan, 061533Z Apr 93, sub : Advanced Warfighting Demo of Battlefield Synchronization (AWDBS). See also John W Cranston, U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Armor <strong>Center</strong> and Fort Knox Annual Command <strong>History</strong>, 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1993, pp. 63-70, for discussions of the experiments. 14<strong>US</strong>ACECOM Briefing Package presented 14 May 1993 by MG Guenther to GEN Jimmy D. Ross, Cdr, AMC, sub: Digitizing the Battlefield. <strong>The</strong> package is covered by Ross's note to GEN Franks, 14 May 1993, SAB, forwarding the slides and recommending the briefing be presented to the CSA with both generals in attendance. 1 5 Message, Cdr SigCen, to distribution, 290050Z May 93, sub : CNR Protocols and Message Formats. MG McVey's letter, SFAE-ASM-AB-S, to Cdrs CECOM and SigCen, 27 May 1993, sub: Combat Net Radio (NRP) and Message Protocols, in protest responds to the results of a May meeting of the Protocol Working Group at which the Tacfire decision was reached. 16 SARD-SI Information Paper, 10 June 1993, sub : Interoperability of the Digital Battlefield. 17 Memorandum, GEN Sullivan for distribution, 24 July 1993, sub: Trip to Fort Lewis, Washington; San Jose and Fort Irwin, California; and Des Moines, Iowa, 22-24 July 1993, describing his observation of one exercise of the IVIS-equipped unit. Message, GEN Franks Personal for GEN Sullivan, 01l705Z Sep 93, sub: Advanced Warfighting Demonstration (AWD): Battlefield Synchronization, reporting to Sullivan on the results of the July 93 exercise at the NTC with the 1st Cavalry Division. See also Del Carlo, "A Glimpse of the Digitized Battlefield at the National Training <strong>Center</strong>," passim, and John C. Johnston, "<strong>The</strong> Journey to Force XXI's Mounted Component," Armor, CIII:2 (March-April 1994), 14-16. 18 Read-ahead package wlattachments prepared by DCSOPS, after 12 July 1993, sub: Horizontal Technology Integration (HTI) General <strong>Of</strong>ficer Working Group (GOWG) 1. 19 Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, <strong>Army</strong>, from LTG Forster, 13 August 1993, sub: Battlefield Digitization Update, which reflects an incorrect date (20 July) for the meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group, with attachments. 20 Memorandum for See Distribution, from MG Garner and MG Hite, 3 August 1993, sub: Minutes of 125
- Page 3 and 4:
We live in an era of dynamic change
- Page 5 and 6:
The preparation of this history of
- Page 7 and 8:
THE MODERN LOUISIANA MANEUVERS CHAN
- Page 9 and 10:
oritized the allocation of LAM seed
- Page 11:
in the GOWGs and BoDs either had so
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter Page 4. Institutionalizing
- Page 17 and 18:
On 9 March 1992, GEN Gordon R. Sull
- Page 19 and 20:
gers of being unprepared. He recoun
- Page 21:
Infantry Division (Mechanized) (lst
- Page 24:
eral Combat Training Centers was on
- Page 27 and 28:
Figure 1 A Sense of History "Strate
- Page 29 and 30:
R. Gabel's recently published book,
- Page 31:
quisition cycles, and save money an
- Page 34 and 35:
among the players contributed great
- Page 36 and 37:
BG To mmy R. Franks ODCSOPS draft c
- Page 38 and 39:
the briefing and established the or
- Page 40 and 41:
where and in what quantities, using
- Page 42 and 43:
1 Final Report of the Special Study
- Page 44 and 45:
29 See Interview, Nelson with Yarri
- Page 46 and 47:
10-11. See also Peay's letter to BG
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 2 THE LOUISIANA MANEUVERS P
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 5 tual experimental work on
- Page 53 and 54:
move an issue from approval by the
- Page 55 and 56:
ing his own and the process could p
- Page 57 and 58:
tank crews from proper attention to
- Page 59 and 60:
mercially available, space-based C4
- Page 61 and 62:
services participated, the Joint St
- Page 63 and 64:
the Army. For all his efforts and t
- Page 65 and 66:
eal understanding of what Louisiana
- Page 67 and 68:
1 GEN Sullivan to BG Mountcastle, 1
- Page 69 and 70:
26 Message from Cdr SigCen to PEOs,
- Page 71 and 72:
eminded BG Eric Shinseki, the Direc
- Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 REORIENTING LAM: THE FORC
- Page 75 and 76:
Figure 7 Office of the Director Syn
- Page 78 and 79:
CONTROL EVENT r-- FY 95 BA DECISION
- Page 80 and 81:
ties and programs for all to see. W
- Page 82 and 83:
the GOWGs in importance. In additio
- Page 84 and 85:
In fact, the Force XXI Campaign sho
- Page 86 and 87:
axis. In addition, ODCSOPS controll
- Page 88 and 89:
1 Memorandum for See Distribution f
- Page 90 and 91: ful enhancements to the operational
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4 INSTITUTIONALIZING LAM AN
- Page 95 and 96: ecause it had no orders to stop and
- Page 97 and 98: quirements (CCIR) (see Figure 11).
- Page 99 and 100: Reimer announced in mid-March that,
- Page 101 and 102: I Interview, Sullivan with Yarrison
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 5 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AN
- Page 105 and 106: Sullivan knew that some members of
- Page 107 and 108: and shortly after Sullivan's term.
- Page 109 and 110: clearer direction from the Chief fo
- Page 111: 1 Sullivan in Sullivan Papers, Pers
- Page 114 and 115: STOW-E SWG Synch TAV TDA TOE TRADOC
- Page 116 and 117: Army Materiel Command (AMC) MACOM
- Page 118 and 119: Staff, Army, to execute the Louisia
- Page 120 and 121: Appendix C MODERN LOUISIANA MANEUVE
- Page 122 and 123: DATE 3-4 Oct 16-18 Oct Late Janearl
- Page 124 and 125: tions, or mobilization and deployme
- Page 126 and 127: MAJOR DUTY ASSIGNMENTS Nov 59-Feb 6
- Page 128 and 129: FOREIGN DECORATIONS (in chronologic
- Page 130 and 131: (OTN) assessment. Key points made a
- Page 132 and 133: the AWD , as MG White briefed GEN F
- Page 134 and 135: 23 Letter, MG White to GEN Franks,
- Page 136 and 137: team. This demonstration shows the
- Page 138 and 139: ordination with the Army, to develo
- Page 142 and 143: Meeting on Battlefield Digitization
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix H MEMORANDUM FOR BG TOMMY
- Page 147 and 148: will designate a General Officer st
- Page 149 and 150: Appendix I CHIEF OF STAFF MESSAGE B
- Page 151 and 152: • Responsibility will remain hier
- Page 153 and 154: Appendix ] CHIEF OF STAFF MESSAGE L
- Page 155 and 156: Appendix K ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEWS
- Page 157 and 158: Abrams, GEN Creighton W: 1, 7 Adams