ful enhancements to the operational <strong>Army</strong>. In LAM TF Files, Box 1, File 3-3d. 24 LAM Task Force Significant Activities Report files for 1994 and 1995 in the LAM TF Files, Box 3, Files 3-5g and h. See also Interview, Blackwell with Yarrison, 16 October 1996, pp. 10, 13-14. 25 See the Chronology of <strong>Army</strong> Digitization Efforts, Appendix G. 26 <strong>The</strong> game plan for much of the work that the Joint Venture axis undertook can be glimpsed in Message, GEN Franks to his subordinate commanders, info to the CSA and the rest of the <strong>Army</strong>, 2S1429Z April 1994, sub : <strong>The</strong> Way Ahead-Post AWE 94-07. Historian's files. See also TRADOC Pamphlet 525-5, 1 August 1994, Force XXI Operations, particularly p. 2- 6. See also HQDA, Congressional Activities Division, <strong>Army</strong> Focus 94: Force XXI: America's <strong>Army</strong> in <strong>The</strong> 21st Century, September 1994, pp. 3S-42. Other publications are: Lee Smith, "New Ideas from the <strong>Army</strong> (Really)," Fortune, 19 September 1994, 203-212; and ''Tomorrow's Wireless Warriors: Digitizing the Battlefield," Wireless 4 Oanuary-February 1995), lS-24, 26, 2S. <strong>The</strong> Wireless article is particularly useful to potential contractors because it describes (26, 2S) exactly those technologies the ARL was seeking to investigate. 27 Message, GEN Franks personal for Sullivan, 2S144SZ April 1994, sub: AWE 94-07 Hot Wash. Franks discusses how emerging insights from the AWE point the way ahead. Historian's files. Speech, Armor Conference, Fort Knox, KY, 5 May 1994, in Sullivan, Collected Wo rks, pp. 25S-262. See Message, from CG TRADOC personal for multiple addressees, 091 649Z May 94, sub: Force XXI Joint Venture Initiation. Action addressees were primarily those who would be part of the Joint Venture. In Chapter 2, n. 55 above. See also Message, GEN Franks personal for Sullivan, <strong>Army</strong> MACOM commanders and TRADOC commanders and commandants, 232049Z May 1994, sub : AWE Integration Conference Agenda, concerning a 6-7 June 1994 conference at Fort Leavenworth on AWEs to that point and the direction of fu ture experimentation. On TRADOC Pamphlet 525-5, 1 August 1994, see n. 26 above. It is interesting to note that the pamphlet contains undated introductory letters from both GEN Franks and GEN Hartzog on Commanding General, TRADOC, stationery, demonstrating the timeframe in which it was actually published (October 1994). 28 <strong>The</strong> Memorandum of Agreement Between United States <strong>Army</strong> Forces Command (FORSCOM) and United States <strong>Army</strong> Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), sub: Force XXI Experimental Force, was signed by GEN Reimer on 17 April 1995 and by GEN Hartzog on 1 May 1995. Historian's files. 29 Message from Blackwell, DAMO-ZA, faxed 1052, 13 Dec 94, to Cdrs of FORSCOM and TRADOC, and the <strong>Army</strong> Staff, sub : Experimental Force (EXFOR). Sullivan had initially thought to designate the 1st ID, his old command, as the EXFOR, and had sent a handwritten note to GEN Peay, the VCSA, on 6 74 November 1993, tasking Peay to: "Develop a strategy we can use which taps [1st ID] to be the 11 th Air Assault of future. I want to see it laid out before making a move." In Sullivan Papers , CSA Historical Files, Box SA of 10, November-December 1993, Correspondence/Flag Letters/Messages/General <strong>Of</strong>fice Files, Folder-Flag Letters, November 1993, file 33. Sullivan and Franks had discussed formation of an Experimental Force in sufficient detail by mid- 1993 that Franks, on 14 September 1993, forwarded a TRADOC Concept for an Experimental Unit to Sullivan. In Sullivan Papers, CSA Historical Files, Box 7B of 10, September 1993, Correspondence/Flag Letters/Messages/ General <strong>Of</strong>fice Files, Folder 2 of 2, Correspondence Files, September 1993, file 13. He wrote in his sketchbook (Sullivan Papers, Personal Papers, Sketch Books, December 19S9-February 1995, Box 1 of 5, Sketchbook #S, April-December 1994) on 29 November 1994: "Told Butch Funk [2AD] was XFOR '. . Get on with It . . . ' Told him my scheme is to get beyond 10 divisions-l0 divisions is a move we must make but it is really not the important shift-the real concept is to redesign the <strong>Army</strong>. " On the 3 February offsite that preceded the announcement, see Memorandum for Record from LTG Blackwell, 10 February 1995, sub: CSA EXFOR <strong>Of</strong>fsite Meeting, 3 February 1995. See also Memorandum from Sullivan to See Distribution, 14 February 1995, sub: Force XXI Experimental Force Prime Directive . See also Interview, Hubbard with Yarrison, 16 July 1996, pp. 44-49, on development of the initial EXFOR concept in BLITCD at TRADOC. 30 Briefing, ODCSOPS for the ASA(RDA) , 6 October 1994, sub: InstitutionallTDA <strong>Army</strong> RedeSign, lays out how the process would proceed. Message , DAMO FDZ, to MACOM Commanders, lS2235Z Nov 94, sub: Force XXI , TDA Redesign Axis. Message, DAMO FDZ, to MACOM commanders, 191955Z December 1994, sub: Force XXI , TDA Redesign GOSC, announced the subject meeting for 12 January 1995. Memorandum from BG Thomas N. Burnette, Director of Force Programs, DAMO-FDZ, for Force XXI General <strong>Of</strong>ficer Work Group, 15 February 1995, sub: InstitutionallTDA <strong>Army</strong> Redesign Axis Campaign Plan, with enclosures, assigned a suspense for comments of 22 February 1995. All documents are in LAM TF Files, Box 14, File 7-S. 31 Letter from Sullivan to Tilelli, 2S August 1994, no subject; emphaSiS is Sullivan's. In LAM TF Files, Box 2, File 3-4c. 32 Interview, Blackwell with Yarrison, 16 October 1996, pp. 5, 6-1 1; Interview, LeCuyer with Yarrison, 23 October 1996, pp. 17-24; Interview, Tilelli with Yarrison, 23 June 1997, pp. 3-4, 6-10, IS-IS. 33 <strong>Of</strong>fice of the Chief of Staff, <strong>Army</strong>, <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> Task Force, Force XXI: America's <strong>Army</strong> of the 21st Century, Meeting the 21st Century Challenge, Fort Monroe, VA , 15 January 1995. 34 See Robert T. Dail, "<strong>Army</strong> Acquisition Success: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong>
No Brag . . . Just Fact," in <strong>Of</strong>fice of the Chief of Staff, United States <strong>Army</strong>, Weekly Summary (U), XLIV: 32 (12 August 1994), 19-24, for a good summary of successes to that point. 35 Interview, Hubbard with Yarrison, 9 July 1996, pp. 19-21. 36 Interview, Harper with Yarrison, 2 October 1996, pp. 41-42. Harper stated, in the context of discussing the end of Sullivan's term and whether he could have pushed LAM and Force XXI harder (p. 42), "I didn't do any serious creative work at all after Reorienting LAM: <strong>The</strong> Force XXI Campaign Christmas of '94. [GEN Sullivan] and I sat down and had a meeting and decided we weren't going to have any more good ideas. It's the nature of the <strong>Army</strong>. GEN Reimer will find that out in two more years." 37 Sullivan interview with GEN (Ret.) Jack N. Merritt conducted over several days in mid-February 1995. Interview published as "A Talk with the Chief," <strong>Army</strong> 45:6 Gune 1995), 20. 38 Dave Blodgett et al. Future Status and Command and Control of the <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> Task Force. McLean, VA : SAIC, 1 June 1995, p. 33. 75
- Page 3 and 4:
We live in an era of dynamic change
- Page 5 and 6:
The preparation of this history of
- Page 7 and 8:
THE MODERN LOUISIANA MANEUVERS CHAN
- Page 9 and 10:
oritized the allocation of LAM seed
- Page 11:
in the GOWGs and BoDs either had so
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter Page 4. Institutionalizing
- Page 17 and 18:
On 9 March 1992, GEN Gordon R. Sull
- Page 19 and 20:
gers of being unprepared. He recoun
- Page 21:
Infantry Division (Mechanized) (lst
- Page 24:
eral Combat Training Centers was on
- Page 27 and 28:
Figure 1 A Sense of History "Strate
- Page 29 and 30:
R. Gabel's recently published book,
- Page 31:
quisition cycles, and save money an
- Page 34 and 35:
among the players contributed great
- Page 36 and 37:
BG To mmy R. Franks ODCSOPS draft c
- Page 38 and 39:
the briefing and established the or
- Page 40 and 41: where and in what quantities, using
- Page 42 and 43: 1 Final Report of the Special Study
- Page 44 and 45: 29 See Interview, Nelson with Yarri
- Page 46 and 47: 10-11. See also Peay's letter to BG
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 2 THE LOUISIANA MANEUVERS P
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 5 tual experimental work on
- Page 53 and 54: move an issue from approval by the
- Page 55 and 56: ing his own and the process could p
- Page 57 and 58: tank crews from proper attention to
- Page 59 and 60: mercially available, space-based C4
- Page 61 and 62: services participated, the Joint St
- Page 63 and 64: the Army. For all his efforts and t
- Page 65 and 66: eal understanding of what Louisiana
- Page 67 and 68: 1 GEN Sullivan to BG Mountcastle, 1
- Page 69 and 70: 26 Message from Cdr SigCen to PEOs,
- Page 71 and 72: eminded BG Eric Shinseki, the Direc
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 3 REORIENTING LAM: THE FORC
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 7 Office of the Director Syn
- Page 78 and 79: CONTROL EVENT r-- FY 95 BA DECISION
- Page 80 and 81: ties and programs for all to see. W
- Page 82 and 83: the GOWGs in importance. In additio
- Page 84 and 85: In fact, the Force XXI Campaign sho
- Page 86 and 87: axis. In addition, ODCSOPS controll
- Page 88 and 89: 1 Memorandum for See Distribution f
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4 INSTITUTIONALIZING LAM AN
- Page 95 and 96: ecause it had no orders to stop and
- Page 97 and 98: quirements (CCIR) (see Figure 11).
- Page 99 and 100: Reimer announced in mid-March that,
- Page 101 and 102: I Interview, Sullivan with Yarrison
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 5 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AN
- Page 105 and 106: Sullivan knew that some members of
- Page 107 and 108: and shortly after Sullivan's term.
- Page 109 and 110: clearer direction from the Chief fo
- Page 111: 1 Sullivan in Sullivan Papers, Pers
- Page 114 and 115: STOW-E SWG Synch TAV TDA TOE TRADOC
- Page 116 and 117: Army Materiel Command (AMC) MACOM
- Page 118 and 119: Staff, Army, to execute the Louisia
- Page 120 and 121: Appendix C MODERN LOUISIANA MANEUVE
- Page 122 and 123: DATE 3-4 Oct 16-18 Oct Late Janearl
- Page 124 and 125: tions, or mobilization and deployme
- Page 126 and 127: MAJOR DUTY ASSIGNMENTS Nov 59-Feb 6
- Page 128 and 129: FOREIGN DECORATIONS (in chronologic
- Page 130 and 131: (OTN) assessment. Key points made a
- Page 132 and 133: the AWD , as MG White briefed GEN F
- Page 134 and 135: 23 Letter, MG White to GEN Franks,
- Page 136 and 137: team. This demonstration shows the
- Page 138 and 139: ordination with the Army, to develo
- Page 140 and 141:
30 January 1995-The ADO issues the
- Page 142 and 143:
Meeting on Battlefield Digitization
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix H MEMORANDUM FOR BG TOMMY
- Page 147 and 148:
will designate a General Officer st
- Page 149 and 150:
Appendix I CHIEF OF STAFF MESSAGE B
- Page 151 and 152:
• Responsibility will remain hier
- Page 153 and 154:
Appendix ] CHIEF OF STAFF MESSAGE L
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix K ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEWS
- Page 157 and 158:
Abrams, GEN Creighton W: 1, 7 Adams